Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Effects of predictability and competition on group and individual choice in a free-ranging foraging environment.

Tan L, Sosa F, Talbot E, Berg D, Eversz D, Hackenberg TD.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Mar;101(2):288-302. doi: 10.1002/jeab.76.

PMID:
24500764
2.

The interplay between individual, social, and environmental influences on chimpanzee food choices.

Finestone E, Bonnie KE, Hopper LM, Vreeman VM, Lonsdorf EV, Ross SR.

Behav Processes. 2014 Jun;105:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.006.

PMID:
24680959
3.

Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

Kraft JR, Baum WM.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):21-42.

4.
5.

Human group choice: discrete-trial and free-operant tests of the ideal free distribution.

Madden GJ, Peden BF, Yamaguchi T.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jul;78(1):1-15.

6.

A simple method for detection of food foraging behavior in the rat: involvement of NMDA and dopamine receptors in the behavior.

Li F, Cao WY, Li MB, Xu Y, Zhang JW, Zhang JY, Luo XG, Dai RP, Zhou XF, Li CQ.

Neuroscience. 2012 Mar 15;205:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.057.

PMID:
22244978
7.

The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.

Anderson KG, Velkey AJ, Woolverton WL.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):319-26.

PMID:
12373433
8.
9.

Exploring foraging decisions in a social primate using discrete-choice models.

Marshall HH, Carter AJ, Coulson T, Rowcliffe JM, Cowlishaw G.

Am Nat. 2012 Oct;180(4):481-95. doi: 10.1086/667587.

PMID:
22976011
10.

Cooperation improves the access of wild boars (Sus scrofa) to food sources.

Focardi S, Morimando F, Capriotti S, Ahmed A, Genov P.

Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.019.

PMID:
26522932
11.

Momentary maximizing and optimal foraging theories of performance on concurrent VR schedules.

MacDonall JS, Goodell J, Juliano A.

Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):283-99.

PMID:
16631321
12.

Anterior cingulate cortical lesion attenuates food foraging in rats.

Li F, Li M, Cao W, Xu Y, Luo Y, Zhong X, Zhang J, Dai R, Zhou XF, Li Z, Li C.

Brain Res Bull. 2012 Sep 1;88(6):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.05.015.

PMID:
22683801
13.

Matching law analysis of rats' alcohol self-administration in a free-operant choice procedure.

Jimenez-Gomez C, Shahan TA.

Behav Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;19(4):353-6. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e328308f1c5.

PMID:
18622184
15.

The approximately ideal, more or less free distribution.

Ollason JG, Yearsley JM.

Theor Popul Biol. 2001 Mar;59(2):87-105. Erratum in: Theor Popul Biol 2002 Mar;61(2):249-50.

PMID:
11302755
16.

Amygdala Signaling during Foraging in a Hazardous Environment.

Amir A, Lee SC, Headley DB, Herzallah MM, Pare D.

J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 23;35(38):12994-3005. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0407-15.2015.

17.

Choice with frequently changing food rates and food ratios.

Baum WM, Davison M.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Mar;101(2):246-74. doi: 10.1002/jeab.70.

PMID:
24403110
18.

Social influences of competition on impulsive choices in domestic chicks.

Amita H, Kawamori A, Matsushima T.

Biol Lett. 2010 Apr 23;6(2):183-6. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0748.

19.

Most domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) prefer food to petting: population, context, and schedule effects in concurrent choice.

Feuerbacher EN, Wynne CD.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 May;101(3):385-405. doi: 10.1002/jeab.81.

PMID:
24643871
20.

Competition avoidance drives individual differences in response to a changing food resource in sticklebacks.

Laskowski KL, Bell AM.

Ecol Lett. 2013 Jun;16(6):746-53. doi: 10.1111/ele.12105.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center