Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Characteristics of networks of interventions: a description of a database of 186 published networks.

Nikolakopoulou A, Chaimani A, Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Schmid CH, Salanti G.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e86754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086754. eCollection 2014.

2.

A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data.

Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Soobiah C, Elliott MJ, Tricco AC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 27;16:47. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0146-y. Review.

3.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

4.

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, Forbes A.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.

PMID:
25271098
5.

Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.

Petropoulou M, Nikolakopoulou A, Veroniki AA, Rios P, Vafaei A, Zarin W, Giannatsi M, Sullivan S, Tricco AC, Chaimani A, Egger M, Salanti G.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Review.

PMID:
27864068
6.

Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.

Callaghan A, Kendall G, Lock C, Mahony A, Payne J, Verrier L.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33.

PMID:
27819973
7.

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews.

Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2009 Apr 3;338:b1147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1147. Review.

8.

Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.

Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C.

PLoS One. 2010 Nov 10;5(11):e11054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054. Review.

9.

An investigation of the impact of using different methods for network meta-analysis: a protocol for an empirical evaluation.

Karahalios AE, Salanti G, Turner SL, Herbison GP, White IR, Veroniki AA, Nikolakopoulou A, Mckenzie JE.

Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 24;6(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0511-x.

10.

Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions.

Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Li T, Higgins JPT, Salanti G.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.015. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

PMID:
28088593
11.

Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed.

Li T, Puhan MA, Vedula SS, Singh S, Dickersin K; Ad Hoc Network Meta-analysis Methods Meeting Working Group.

BMC Med. 2011 Jun 27;9:79. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-79.

12.

Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.

Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, Ravaud P.

BMJ. 2014 Mar 11;348:g1741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1741. Review.

13.

Using conditional power of network meta-analysis (NMA) to inform the design of future clinical trials.

Nikolakopoulou A, Mavridis D, Salanti G.

Biom J. 2014 Nov;56(6):973-90. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300216. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

PMID:
25225031
14.

Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions.

Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Higgins JP, Salanti G.

Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):332-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys222. Erratum in: Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):919.

15.

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review.

Zarin W, Veroniki AA, Nincic V, Vafaei A, Reynen E, Motiwala SS, Antony J, Sullivan SM, Rios P, Daly C, Ewusie J, Petropoulou M, Nikolakopoulou A, Chaimani A, Salanti G, Straus SE, Tricco AC.

BMC Med. 2017 Jan 5;15(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0764-6. Erratum in: BMC Med. 2017 Mar 14;15(1):61.

16.

Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.

Veroniki AA, Soobiah C, Tricco AC, Elliott MJ, Straus SE.

BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 29;5(4):e007103. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007103. Review.

17.

Disconnected by design: analytic approach in treatment networks having no common comparator.

Goring SM, Gustafson P, Liu Y, Saab S, Cline SK, Platt RW.

Res Synth Methods. 2016 Dec;7(4):420-432. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1204. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

PMID:
27061025
18.

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Weeks L, Peters J, Kober T, Dias S, Schulz KF, Plint AC, Moher D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23152285
19.

Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.

Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, Ravaud P.

BMJ. 2013 Jul 1;347:f3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3675. Review.

20.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L.

J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center