Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 456

1.

Neural stem cells derived from epiblast stem cells display distinctive properties.

Jang HJ, Kim JS, Choi HW, Jeon I, Choi S, Kim MJ, Song J, Do JT.

Stem Cell Res. 2014 Mar;12(2):506-16. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

2.

Comparative FAIRE-seq analysis reveals distinguishing features of the chromatin structure of ground state- and primed-pluripotent cells.

Murtha M, Strino F, Tokcaer-Keskin Z, Sumru Bayin N, Shalabi D, Xi X, Kluger Y, Dailey L.

Stem Cells. 2015 Feb;33(2):378-91. doi: 10.1002/stem.1871.

3.

Efficient derivation of bovine embryonic stem cells needs more than active core pluripotency factors.

Maruotti J, Muñoz M, Degrelle SA, Gómez E, Louet C, Díez C, de Longchamp PH, Brochard V, Hue I, Caamaño JN, Jouneau A.

Mol Reprod Dev. 2012 Jul;79(7):461-77. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22051. Epub 2012 May 31. Erratum in: Mol Reprod Dev. 2012 Dec;79(12):888. Monforte, Carmen Díez [corrected to Díez, Carmen].

PMID:
22573702
4.

Distinct developmental ground states of epiblast stem cell lines determine different pluripotency features.

Bernemann C, Greber B, Ko K, Sterneckert J, Han DW, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Schöler HR.

Stem Cells. 2011 Oct;29(10):1496-503. doi: 10.1002/stem.709.

5.

Establishment of a primed pluripotent epiblast stem cell in FGF4-based conditions.

Joo JY, Choi HW, Kim MJ, Zaehres H, Tapia N, Stehling M, Jung KS, Do JT, Schöler HR.

Sci Rep. 2014 Dec 17;4:7477. doi: 10.1038/srep07477. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2015;5:8180.

6.

From Naive to Primed Pluripotency: In Vitro Conversion of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells in Epiblast Stem Cells.

Tosolini M, Jouneau A.

Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1341:209-16. doi: 10.1007/7651_2015_208.

PMID:
25720370
7.

A simple and robust method for establishing homogeneous mouse epiblast stem cell lines by wnt inhibition.

Sugimoto M, Kondo M, Koga Y, Shiura H, Ikeda R, Hirose M, Ogura A, Murakami A, Yoshiki A, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Abe K.

Stem Cell Reports. 2015 Apr 14;4(4):744-57. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

8.

Epiblast stem cell subpopulations represent mouse embryos of distinct pregastrulation stages.

Han DW, Tapia N, Joo JY, Greber B, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Bernemann C, Ko K, Wu G, Stehling M, Do JT, Schöler HR.

Cell. 2010 Nov 12;143(4):617-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.015.

9.

The transcriptional and functional properties of mouse epiblast stem cells resemble the anterior primitive streak.

Kojima Y, Kaufman-Francis K, Studdert JB, Steiner KA, Power MD, Loebel DA, Jones V, Hor A, de Alencastro G, Logan GJ, Teber ET, Tam OH, Stutz MD, Alexander IE, Pickett HA, Tam PP.

Cell Stem Cell. 2014 Jan 2;14(1):107-20. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

10.

Contrasting transcriptome landscapes of rabbit pluripotent stem cells in vitro and in vivo.

Schmaltz-Panneau B, Jouneau L, Osteil P, Tapponnier Y, Afanassieff M, Moroldo M, Jouneau A, Daniel N, Archilla C, Savatier P, Duranthon V.

Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Sep;149(1-2):67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

PMID:
25059199
11.

Primed pluripotent cell lines derived from various embryonic origins and somatic cells in pig.

Park JK, Kim HS, Uh KJ, Choi KH, Kim HM, Lee T, Yang BC, Kim HJ, Ka HH, Kim H, Lee CK.

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052481. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

12.

Otx2 is an intrinsic determinant of the embryonic stem cell state and is required for transition to a stable epiblast stem cell condition.

Acampora D, Di Giovannantonio LG, Simeone A.

Development. 2013 Jan 1;140(1):43-55. doi: 10.1242/dev.085290. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

13.

Self-renewing epiblast stem cells exhibit continual delineation of germ cells with epigenetic reprogramming in vitro.

Hayashi K, Surani MA.

Development. 2009 Nov;136(21):3549-56. doi: 10.1242/dev.037747. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

14.

In Vivo differentiation potential of epiblast stem cells revealed by chimeric embryo formation.

Huang Y, Osorno R, Tsakiridis A, Wilson V.

Cell Rep. 2012 Dec 27;2(6):1571-8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.022. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

15.

Epiblast ground state is controlled by canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the postimplantation mouse embryo and epiblast stem cells.

Sumi T, Oki S, Kitajima K, Meno C.

PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e63378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063378. Print 2013.

16.

Mitochondrial and metabolic remodeling during reprogramming and differentiation of the reprogrammed cells.

Choi HW, Kim JH, Chung MK, Hong YJ, Jang HS, Seo BJ, Jung TH, Kim JS, Chung HM, Byun SJ, Han SG, Seo HG, Do JT.

Stem Cells Dev. 2015 Jun 1;24(11):1366-73. doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0561. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

PMID:
25590788
17.

Reduced oxygen concentration enhances conversion of embryonic stem cells to epiblast stem cells.

Takehara T, Teramura T, Onodera Y, Hamanishi C, Fukuda K.

Stem Cells Dev. 2012 May 20;21(8):1239-49. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0322. Epub 2011 Oct 18.

PMID:
21861689
18.

Mouse primed embryonic stem cells could be maintained and reprogrammed on human amnion epithelial cells.

Chen YF, Dong Z, Jiang L, Lai D, Guo L.

Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Jan 15;22(2):320-9. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0325. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

PMID:
22985337
19.

Reversion of mouse postimplantation epiblast stem cells to a naïve pluripotent state by modulation of signalling pathways.

Gillich A, Bao S, Surani MA.

Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1074:15-29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-628-3_2.

PMID:
23975802
20.

Comparison of the Ultrastructures of Primed and Naïve Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Lai D, Bu S.

Cell Reprogram. 2016 Feb;18(1):48-53. doi: 10.1089/cell.2015.0063. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

PMID:
26757253

Supplemental Content

Support Center