Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 270

1.

Can plate osteosynthesis of periprosthethic femoral fractures cause cement mantle failure around a stable hip stem? A biomechanical analysis.

Giesinger K, Ebneter L, Day RE, Stoffel KK, Yates PJ, Kuster MS.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1308-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

PMID:
24439999
2.

Plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures: What happens to the cement mantle?

Konstantinidis L, Schmidt B, Bernstein A, Hirschmüller A, Schröter S, Südkamp NP, Helwig P.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Feb;231(2):138-142. doi: 10.1177/0954411916682769. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

PMID:
28013577
3.

Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.

Hoffmann MF, Burgers TA, Mason JJ, Williams BO, Sietsema DL, Jones CB.

Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

PMID:
24680467
4.
5.

Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Wähnert D, Schröder R, Schulze M, Westerhoff P, Raschke M, Stange R.

Int Orthop. 2014 Jan;38(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2113-0. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

6.

Revision total hip arthroplasty for a Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic fracture using an allograft-cemented stem composite by the telescoping technique.

Ogawa H, Ito Y, Takigami I, Shimizu K.

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Jun;26(4):665.e25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

PMID:
20637558
7.

The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Leonidou A, Moazen M, Lepetsos P, Graham SM, Macheras GA, Tsiridis E.

Injury. 2015 Feb;46(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.060. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

PMID:
25467710
8.

Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Biomechanical Analysis of Cerclage Fixation.

Frisch NB, Charters MA, Sikora-Klak J, Banglmaier RF, Oravec DJ, Silverton CD.

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Aug;30(8):1449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

PMID:
25765131
9.

[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].

Krbec M, Motycka J, Lunácek L, Dousa P.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8. Czech.

PMID:
20067694
10.

Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a well-fixed hip arthroplasty implant: span the whole bone.

Moloney GB, Westrick ER, Siska PA, Tarkin IS.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jan;134(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1883-6. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

PMID:
24253261
11.

Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Buttaro MA, Farfalli G, Paredes Núñez M, Comba F, Piccaluga F.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1964-9.

PMID:
17768193
12.

Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures.

Froberg L, Troelsen A, Brix M.

Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):648-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.747925. Epub 2012 Nov 11.

13.

Better Axial Stiffness of a Bicortical Screw Construct Compared to a Cable Construct for Comminuted Vancouver B1 Proximal Femoral Fractures.

Griffiths JT, Taheri A, Day RE, Yates PJ.

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.060. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

PMID:
26239233
14.

Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.

Lochab J, Carrothers A, Wong E, McLachlin S, Aldebeyan W, Jenkinson R, Whyne C, Nousiainen MT.

J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan;31(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000704.

PMID:
28002219
15.

Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Chen DW, Lin CL, Hu CC, Wu JW, Lee MS.

Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1061-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

PMID:
22336128
16.

Comparison of fixation techniques in Vancouver type AG periprosthetic femoral fracture: a biomechanical study.

Sarıyılmaz K, Korkmaz M, Özkunt O, Gemalmaz HC, Sungur M, Baydoğan M, Kaya İ, Dikici F.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(3):373-8. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0298.

17.

A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures.

Lenz M, Perren SM, Gueorguiev B, Richards RG, Hofmann GO, Fernandez dell'Oca A, Höntzsch D, Windolf M.

Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.027. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

PMID:
24252576
18.

A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone.

Demos HA, Briones MS, White PH, Hogan KA, Barfield WR.

J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

PMID:
22014657
19.

Cement-in-cement femoral revision for the treatment of highly selected vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Crawford RW.

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26(2):335-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 May 11.

PMID:
20462735
20.

Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Gwinner C, Märdian S, Dröge T, Schulze M, Raschke MJ, Stange R.

Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1749-55. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2787-6. Epub 2015 May 7.

PMID:
25947899

Supplemental Content

Support Center