Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing.

Schneider D, Schober F, Grohmann P, Hammerle CH, Jung RE.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):320-5. doi: 10.1111/clr.12327. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

PMID:
24438229
2.

Investigations on the accuracy of 3D-printed drill guides for dental implantology.

Neumeister A, Schulz L, Glodecki C.

Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(1):35-51.

PMID:
28294204
3.

Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery.

Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jun;24(6):630-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02436.x. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

PMID:
22413853
4.

Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Lee DH, An SY, Hong MH, Jeon KB, Lee KB.

J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;8(3):207-13. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.207. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

5.

Tolerance within a surgical guide.

Van Assche N, Quirynen M.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Apr 1;21(4):455-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01836.x. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

PMID:
20074247
6.

Technical accuracy of printed surgical templates for guided implant surgery with the coDiagnostiX ™ software.

Kühl S, Payer M, Zitzmann NU, Lambrecht JT, Filippi A.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e177-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12152. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

PMID:
24020645
7.

Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.

Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ.

J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Apr;113(4):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.018. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

PMID:
25681352
8.

Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation.

Kalt G, Gehrke P.

Int J Comput Dent. 2008;11(3-4):213-25. English, German.

PMID:
19216313
9.

Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.

Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, Zöller JE.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Nov;20(11):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01764.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

PMID:
19681962
10.

Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report.

Ozan O, Seker E, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ersoy AE.

J Oral Implantol. 2012 Oct;38(5):603-9. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00010. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

PMID:
21767212
11.

Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method.

Kang SH, Lee JW, Lim SH, Kim YH, Kim MK.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1530-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.025. Epub 2014 May 2.

PMID:
24954760
12.

Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.

Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1156-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

PMID:
19519787
13.

Accuracy of chairside-milled CAD/CAM drill guides for dental implants.

Ritter L, Palmer J, Bindl A, Irsen S, Cizek J, Karapetian VE, Zöller JE.

Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(2):115-24. English, German.

PMID:
25098159
14.

A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.

Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M.

J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul;41(7):717-23. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12231. Epub 2014 Apr 10.

PMID:
24460748
15.

Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.

Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL.

J Periodontol. 2005 Apr;76(4):503-7.

PMID:
15857088
16.

Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production.

Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale R.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):72-8.

PMID:
17340899
17.
18.

Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.

Al-Harbi SA, Sun AY.

Implant Dent. 2009 Feb;18(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c6a50.

PMID:
19212237
19.

Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.

Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):563-72. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3025.

PMID:
23527361
20.

Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.

Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T.

J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):43-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348.

PMID:
20059416

Supplemental Content

Support Center