Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 49

1.

In-vitro assessment of coronary artery stents in 256-multislice computed tomography angiography.

André F, Müller D, Korosoglou G, Hosch W, Kauczor HU, Katus HA, Steen H.

BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jan 14;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-38.

2.

In vitro evaluation of 56 coronary artery stents by 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT.

Steen H, André F, Korosoglou G, Mueller D, Hosch W, Kauczor HU, Giannitsis E, Katus HA.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Oct;80(1):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.007.

PMID:
20817435
3.

Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation.

Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, Ruebben A, Stanzel S, Vogt F, Günther RW, Blindt R.

Invest Radiol. 2004 Jan;39(1):27-33.

PMID:
14701986
4.

Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.

Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H, Bunck AC, Ozgün M, Fischbach R, Jürgens KU, Heindel W.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):42-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1132-5.

PMID:
18682956
5.

Evaluation of middle cerebral artery stents using multidetector row CT angiography in vivo study: comparison of the three different kernels.

Jang JH, Lim YS, Lee YJ, Yoo WJ, Sung MS, Kim BS.

Acta Radiol. 2012 May 1;53(4):456-60. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110659.

PMID:
22393160
6.

Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.

Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J, Stanzel S, Kuettner A, Wildberger JE, Günther RW.

Invest Radiol. 2005 Jan;40(1):8-13.

PMID:
15597014
7.

Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.

Sirineni GK, Kalra MK, Pottala K, Waldrop S, Syed M, Tigges S.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Apr;23(2):253-63.

PMID:
16821123
8.

64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.

Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, Flohr T, Rink M, Sommer T, Ozgün M, Heindel W, Fischbach R.

Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):818-26.

PMID:
16333623
9.

Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound.

Roura G, Gomez-Lara J, Ferreiro JL, Gomez-Hospital JA, Romaguera R, Teruel LM, Carreño E, Esplugas E, Alfonso F, Cequier A.

Heart. 2013 Aug;99(15):1106-12. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303679.

PMID:
23723447
10.

[Imaging of coronary stents using multislice computed tomography].

Seifarth H, Heindel W, Maintz D.

Radiologe. 2010 Jun;50(6):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-1990-0. German.

PMID:
20521021
11.

Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents.

André F, Korosoglou G, Hosch W, Giannitsis E, Kauczor HU, Katus HA, Steen H.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Apr;82(4):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.039.

PMID:
23280306
12.

Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel.

Yoo WJ, Lim YS, Ahn KJ, Choi BG, Kim JY, Kim SH.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 May;70(2):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.039.

PMID:
18359179
13.

Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.

Lettau M, Kotter E, Bendszus M, Hähnel S.

J Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct;41(4):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.10.003.

14.

Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation.

Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Grude M, Heindel W, Fischbach R.

Eur Radiol. 2003 Apr;13(4):830-5.

PMID:
12664124
15.

64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: a phantom study.

Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Stanzel S, Wildberger JE, Günther RW, Kuettner A.

Acta Radiol. 2006 Feb;47(1):36-42.

PMID:
16498931
16.

Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique.

Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T, Krämer S, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R.

Invest Radiol. 2003 Dec;38(12):790-5.

PMID:
14627897
17.

Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?

Lettau M, Bendszus M, Hähnel S.

Neuroradiology. 2013 Jun;55(6):675-82. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1152-y.

PMID:
23411716
18.

Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents using two different angiography systems.

Lettau M, Bendszus M, Hähnel S.

J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;40(5):348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.03.003.

19.

In vivo evaluation of carotid artery stents using multi-detector-row computed tomography angiography: comparison of 3 kernels.

Lee YJ, Lim YS, Jung NY, Yoo WJ, Sung MS, Chung MH, Kim BS.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 May-Jun;37(3):402-7. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318289a9f9.

PMID:
23674012
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center