Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.

Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F, Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A, Zogheib E, Lasocki S, Vieillard-Baron A, Quintard H, Joannes-Boyau O, Plantefève G, Montravers P, Duperret S, Lakhdari M, Ammenouche N, Lorne E, Slama M, Dupont H.

Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):681-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet442. Epub 2013 Dec 29. Update in: Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):617-20.

PMID:
24374504
2.

Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL.

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Apr;31(4):517-23. Epub 2005 Mar 8.

PMID:
15754196
3.

Prevalence of Ventilatory Conditions for Dynamic Fluid Responsiveness Prediction in 2 Tertiary Intensive Care Units.

Mendes PV, Rodrigues BN, Miranda LC, Zampieri FG, Queiroz EL, Schettino G, Azevedo LC, Park M, Taniguchi LU.

J Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;31(4):258-62. doi: 10.1177/0885066614531704. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

PMID:
24756308
4.

Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.

Auler JO Jr, Galas F, Hajjar L, Santos L, Carvalho T, Michard F.

Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1201-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287664.03547.c6.

PMID:
18349193
5.

Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.

Vallée F, Richard JC, Mari A, Gallas T, Arsac E, Verlaan PS, Chousterman B, Samii K, Genestal M, Fourcade O.

Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1004-10. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1478-4. Epub 2009 Apr 4.

PMID:
19347330
6.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.

Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2810-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b74e.

PMID:
18766099
7.

Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.

Freitas FG, Bafi AT, Nascente AP, Assunção M, Mazza B, Azevedo LC, Machado FR.

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):402-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes398. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23161359
8.

Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.

Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A, Dres M, Gharbi R, Richard C, Teboul JL.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):152-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f08d7.

PMID:
21926581
9.

Influence of intra-abdominal pressure on the specificity of pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness.

Royer P, Bendjelid K, Valentino R, Résière D, Chabartier C, Mehdaoui H.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):994-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000605.

PMID:
25909421
10.

Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.

Oliveira-Costa CD, Friedman G, Vieira SR, Fialkow L.

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jul;67(7):773-8.

11.

Pulse pressure variations to guide fluid therapy in donors: a multicentric echocardiographic observational study.

Cinotti R, Roquilly A, Mahé PJ, Feuillet F, Yehia A, Belliard G, Lejus C, Blanloeil Y, Teboul JL, Asehnoune K; ATLANRÉA Group.

J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

PMID:
24798343
12.

Low predictability of three different noninvasive methods to determine fluid responsiveness in critically ill children.

Weber T, Wagner T, Neumann K, Deusch E.

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;16(3):e89-94. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000364.

PMID:
25647238
13.

A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program.

McGee WT.

J Intensive Care Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):352-60. doi: 10.1177/0885066609344908. Epub 2009 Sep 6.

PMID:
19736180
14.
15.

Variation in amplitude of central venous pressure curve induced by respiration is a useful tool to reveal fluid responsiveness in postcardiac surgery patients.

Westphal GA, Silva E, Caldeira Filho M, Roman Gonçalves AR, Poli-de-Figueiredo LF.

Shock. 2006 Aug;26(2):140-5.

PMID:
16878021
16.

The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, Mazoit JX, Hebert JL, Benhamou D, Edouard AR.

Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1511-7.

PMID:
16632835
17.

The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):523-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

PMID:
21642606
18.
19.
20.

Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome.

Wiklund CU, Morel DR, Orbring-Wiklund H, Romand JA, Piriou V, Teboul JL, Bendjelid K.

Anesthesiology. 2010 Sep;113(3):630-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181e908f6.

PMID:
20693877

Supplemental Content

Support Center