Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 65

1.

Images acquired using 320-MDCT with adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition: visual evaluation of image quality by 10 radiologists using an abdominal phantom.

Nitta N, Ikeda M, Sonoda A, Nagatani Y, Ohta S, Takahashi M, Murata K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan;202(1):2-12. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10364.

PMID:
24370123
2.

Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.

Joemai RM, Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Hernandez-Giron I, Geleijns J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1291-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9780.

PMID:
24261369
4.

Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Yamada Y, Jinzaki M, Hosokawa T, Tanami Y, Sugiura H, Abe T, Kuribayashi S.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4185-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

PMID:
22883532
5.

CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT.

Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S, Noel A, Micard E, Felblinger J, Blum A.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2271-7. Epub 2011 Sep 17.

PMID:
21927791
6.

Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.

Matsuki M, Murakami T, Juri H, Yoshikawa S, Narumi Y.

Acta Radiol. 2013 Oct;54(8):869-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113488576. Epub 2013 May 23.

PMID:
23761554
7.

Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.

Seki S, Koyama H, Ohno Y, Matsumoto S, Inokawa H, Sugihara N, Sugimura K.

Acta Radiol. 2016 Jun;57(6):684-90. doi: 10.1177/0284185115603418. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

PMID:
26339037
8.

Adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm in CT: effect on image quality compared with filtered back projection in body phantoms of different sizes.

Kim M, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Son H, Choi JW, Han JK, Choi BI.

Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):195-204. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.195. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

9.

Influence of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm on the detectability of low-contrast lesions and radiation dose repeatability in abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.

Yoon JH, Lee JM, Hur BY, Baek J, Shim H, Han JK, Choi BI.

Abdom Imaging. 2015 Aug;40(6):1843-52. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0333-4.

PMID:
25526686
10.

Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.

Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, Blake MA.

Radiology. 2010 Nov;257(2):373-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092212. Epub 2010 Sep 9.

PMID:
20829535
11.

Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.

Singh S, Kalra MK, Do S, Thibault JB, Pien H, O'Connor OJ, Blake MA.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 May-Jun;36(3):347-53. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31824e639e. Erratum in: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Sep;36(5):627. Connor, Owen O J [corrected to O'Connor, Owen J].

PMID:
22592622
12.

Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.

Borgen L, Kalra MK, Laerum F, Hachette IW, Fredriksson CH, Sandborg M, Smedby O.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):335-42. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110563. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

PMID:
22362136
13.

Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.

Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, Pien H, Hsieh J, Blake MA, Sahani DV.

Invest Radiol. 2010 Apr;45(4):202-10. doi: 10.1097/RLI.ob013e3181dzfeec.

PMID:
20177389
14.

Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.

Singh S, Kalra MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Saini A, Gervais DA, Westra SJ, Thrall JH.

Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):537-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110268.

PMID:
22517962
15.

Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.

Onishi H, Kockelkoren R, Kim T, Hori M, Nakamoto A, Tsuboyama T, Sakane M, Tatsumi M, Uranishi A, Tanaka T, Taniguchi A, Enchi Y, Satoh K, Tomiyama N.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4):629-34. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000242.

PMID:
26125298
16.

Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.

Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, Singh S, Lindblom M, Choy G, Quick P, Schmidt B, Sedlmair M, Blake MA, Persson A.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 May-Jun;36(3):339-46. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825586c0.

PMID:
22592621
17.

Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.

Gervaise A, Osemont B, Louis M, Lecocq S, Teixeira P, Blum A.

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014 Jan;95(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

18.

Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.

Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, Chen GH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1266-74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9382.

19.

A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.

van der Molen AJ, Miclea RL, Geleijns J, Joemai RM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep;205(3):572-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13862.

PMID:
26295643
20.

A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1095-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4050.

PMID:
20966312

Supplemental Content

Support Center