Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Changes in breathing while listening to read speech: the effect of reader and speech mode.

Rochet-Capellan A, Fuchs S.

Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 9;4:906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00906.

2.

Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.

Walshe M, Miller N, Leahy M, Murray A.

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):633-48. doi: 10.1080/13682820801887117.

PMID:
18608608
3.
4.

The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.

Recker KL, Edwards BW.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jan;24(1):17-25. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.1.3.

PMID:
23231813
5.

The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.

Wu YH, Stangl E, Pang C, Zhang X.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):141-53. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.2.3.

PMID:
24828215
6.

The effects of aging on speech perception in noise: comparison between normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Jin SH, Liu C, Sladen DP.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(7):656-65. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.7.4.

PMID:
25365368
7.

Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.

Eadie TL, Doyle PC, Hansen K, Beaudin PG.

J Voice. 2008 Jan;22(1):43-57.

PMID:
17055223
8.

The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.

Patel R, Usher N, Kember H, Russell S, Laures-Gore J.

J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.006.

PMID:
25113966
9.

Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech.

Hochberg I.

Audiology. 1975 Jan-Feb;14(1):27-33.

PMID:
1147843
10.

Characteristics of speech breathing in young women.

Hodge MM, Rochet AP.

J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Sep;32(3):466-80.

PMID:
2779193
11.

The effect of presentation level on memory performance.

Heinrich A, Schneider BA.

Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):524-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820a0281.

PMID:
21278574
12.

Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(7):616-34. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.7.10.

13.

Relationship between speech rate perceived and produced by the listener.

Schwab S.

Phonetica. 2011;68(4):243-55. doi: 10.1159/000335578.

PMID:
22286166
14.

Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Kong YY, Mullangi A, Marozeau J.

Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):645-59. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318252caae.

15.

Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.

Schurman J, Brungart D, Gordon-Salant S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):3337. doi: 10.1121/1.4901708.

PMID:
25480078
16.

Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.

Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.

Ear Hear. 2003 Dec;24(6):472-84.

PMID:
14663347
17.

Listener judges and the speech intelligibility of deaf children.

Mencke EO, Ochsner GJ, Testut EW.

J Commun Disord. 1983 May;16(3):175-80.

PMID:
6875033
18.

Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.

Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ.

J Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Dec;46(5-6):449-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.002.

PMID:
24157128
19.

Respiratory markers of conversational interaction.

McFarland DH.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Feb;44(1):128-43.

PMID:
11218097
20.

Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.

Keintz C.

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Dec;13(6):510-7. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2011.578657.

PMID:
21682545

Supplemental Content

Support Center