Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Choo MS, Cho SY, Ko K, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.

World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1401-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1230-0. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

PMID:
24362883
2.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

3.

Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.

O'Neil LM, Walsh S, Cohen RJ, Lee S.

BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

4.

Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.

De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.

5.

Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.

Rouanne M, Rode J, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, De La Taille A, Salomon L.

Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):131-7. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.813067. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

PMID:
23883410
6.

Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H.

BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

7.

Prognostic impact of time to undetectable prostate-specific antigen in patients with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.

Koo KC, Tuliao P, Komninos C, Choi YD, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Jee SH, Rha KH.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):693-700. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4057-z. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

PMID:
25190131
8.

Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.

Corcoran NM, Hovens CM, Metcalfe C, Hong MK, Pedersen J, Casey RG, Peters J, Harewood L, Goldenberg SL, Costello AJ, Gleave ME.

BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):821-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10868.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.

9.

Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.

Ouzzane A, Rozet F, Salas RS, Galiano M, Barret E, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X.

BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):586-91. doi: 10.1111/bju.12249. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

10.

Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.

Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Cozzarini C, Fiorino C, Gandaglia G, Joniau S, Boorjian SA, Goldner G, Hinkelbein W, Haustermans K, Tombal B, Shariat S, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Van Poppel H, Wiegel T, Briganti A.

Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

PMID:
26497924
11.

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.

Oh JJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Choe G, Lee SE.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Jul;31(5):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

PMID:
21658977
12.

Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.

Shapiro EY, Scarberry K, Patel T, Bergman A, Ahn JJ, Sahi N, RoyChoudhury A, Deutch I, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Badani KK.

J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):208-13. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0393. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

PMID:
24044423
13.
14.

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?

Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M.

BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.

15.

Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.

Faisal FA, Sundi D, Pierorazio PM, Ball MW, Humphreys EB, Han M, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Carter HB, Bivalacqua TJ, Schaeffer EM, Ross AE.

BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E120-E129. doi: 10.1111/bju.12771. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

16.

The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.

Eminaga O, Hinkelammert R, Titze U, Abbas M, Eltze E, Bettendorf O, Semjonow A.

Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):32.e17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.11.021. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

PMID:
23434425
17.
18.

The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients.

Mauermann J, Fradet V, Lacombe L, Dujardin T, Tiguert R, Tetu B, Fradet Y.

Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

PMID:
22901983
19.

Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.

Abdollah F, Sood A, Sammon JD, Hsu L, Beyer B, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Rogers CG, Haese A, Montorsi F, Graefen M, Briganti A, Menon M.

Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

PMID:
26119559
20.

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

Pettenati C, Neuzillet Y, Radulescu C, Hervé JM, Molinié V, Lebret T.

World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1973-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1580-x. Epub 2015 May 5.

PMID:
25939539

Supplemental Content

Support Center