Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 71

1.

[Comparison of controlled pressure belt -allowing mobility to sandbags after percutaneous coronary intervention: pilot study].

Ercan SL, Karslı VM, Davutoğlu V, Huraibat A, Oylumlu M, Inanç IH, Yu Ce M, Aksoy M.

Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013 Dec;41(8):699-704. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2013.04742. Turkish. Erratum in: Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2014 Jan;42(1):120.

2.
3.

A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA.

Tron C, Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, Douillet R, Chassaing S, Sanchez-Giron C, Cribier A.

J Interv Cardiol. 2003 Jun;16(3):217-21.

PMID:
12800399
4.

[Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome].

Gao L, Liu Y, Xue Q, Tian J, Wang Y.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jul 8;94(26):2025-9. Chinese.

PMID:
25312663
5.

[Comparison of pneumatic compression device and sand bag with respect to peripheral vascular complications in elective cardiac catheterization and percutaneous femoral artery interventions].

Beşli F, Alişir MF, Keçebaş M, Serdar OA, Güngören F.

Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013 Sep;41(6):478-85. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2013.27243. Turkish.

6.

Managing risk of complications at femoral vascular access sites in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Merriweather N, Sulzbach-Hoke LM.

Crit Care Nurse. 2012 Oct;32(5):16-29; quiz first page after 29. doi: 10.4037/ccn2012123.

8.

Immediate mobilization after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the AngioSeal vascular closure device (the MOBS study).

Larsen EN, Hansen CB, Thayssen P, Jensen LO.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Oct;13(5):466-72. doi: 10.1177/1474515113516702. Epub 2013 Dec 13.

PMID:
24336239
9.

Effect of changing the duration of keeping sandbag over catheter insertion site on the coronary angiography acute complications: A controlled clinical trial.

Fathi M, Valiee S, Mahmoodi P.

J Vasc Nurs. 2017 Dec;35(4):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

PMID:
29153227
10.

A randomized controlled trial on the hemostasis of femoral artery using topical hemostatic agent.

Kordestani SS, Noohi F, Azarnik H, Basiri H, Hashemi MJ, Abdi S, Mohebi A, Madani M, Nayebhabib F.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2012 Sep;18(5):501-5. doi: 10.1177/1076029611432745. Epub 2012 Feb 6.

PMID:
22311634
11.

Clinical investigation of transradial access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Qin X, Xiong W, Wang L, Guan E, Lu C.

Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1139-42. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S50939. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

12.

Effect of positioning on patient outcomes after coronary angiography: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Bakhshi F, Namjou Z, Andishmand A, Panabadi A, Bagherinasab M, Sarebanhassanabadi M.

J Nurs Res. 2014 Mar;22(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000020.

PMID:
24517899
13.

Effects of three methods of femoral site immobilization on bleeding and comfort after coronary angiogram.

Hogan-Miller E, Rustad D, Sendelbach S, Goldenberg I.

Am J Crit Care. 1995 Mar;4(2):143-8.

PMID:
7749447
14.

Predictors of complications following sheath removal with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Sulzbach-Hoke LM, Ratcliffe SJ, Kimmel SE, Kolansky DM, Polomano R.

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):E1-8. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181c83f4b.

PMID:
20357666
15.

Haematoma after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery frequency and risk factors.

Andersen K, Bregendahl M, Kaestel H, Skriver M, Ravkilde J.

Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Jun;4(2):123-7.

PMID:
15869905
16.

Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.

Romagnoli E, De Vita M, Burzotta F, Cortese B, Biondi-Zoccai G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Lanzillo C, Lucci V, Cavazza C, Tarantino F, Sangiorgi GM, Lioy E, Crea F, Rao SV, Trani C.

Am Heart J. 2013 Dec;166(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

PMID:
24268216
17.
18.

A randomized trial assessing the influence of lying still or being allowed to move in the observation period following coronary angiography using the femoral approach.

May O, Schlosser H, Skytte L.

J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Aug;21(4):347-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00359.x. Epub 2008 May 29.

PMID:
18513345
19.

Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.

Lee MS, Wolfe M, Stone GW.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.003. Review.

20.

Outcome and safety of same-day-discharge percutaneous coronary interventions with femoral access: a single-center experience.

Antonsen L, Jensen LO, Thayssen P.

Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

PMID:
23453109

Supplemental Content

Support Center