Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

When health policy and empirical evidence collide: the case of cigarette package warning labels and economic consumer surplus.

Song AV, Brown P, Glantz SA.

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e42-51. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301737. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

2.

Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.

Cameron LD, Pepper JK, Brewer NT.

Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e14-22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

3.

Challenging key assumptions embedded in Health Canada's cigarette packaging legislation: Findings from in situ interviews with smokers in Vancouver.

Haines-Saah RJ, Bell K.

Can J Public Health. 2017 Mar 1;107(6):e562-e567. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5681.

PMID:
28252376
4.

Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.

Wang AL, Lowen SB, Romer D, Giorno M, Langleben DD.

Tob Control. 2015 May;24(3):225-32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051993. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

5.

Do the ends justify the means? A test of alternatives to the FDA proposed cigarette warning labels.

Byrne S, Katz SJ, Mathios A, Niederdeppe J.

Health Commun. 2015;30(7):680-93. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.895282. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

PMID:
25119144
6.

Assessing the Consequences of Implementing Graphic Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs for Tobacco-Related Health Disparities.

Gibson L, Brennan E, Momjian A, Shapiro-Luft D, Seitz H, Cappella JN.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):898-907. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv082.

7.

Reactions to FDA-Proposed Graphic Warning Labels Affixed to U.S. Smokers' Cigarette Packs.

McQueen A, Kreuter MW, Boyum S, Thompson VS, Caburnay CA, Waters EA, Kaphingst KA, Rath S, Fu Q.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jul;17(7):784-95. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu339. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

8.

An evaluation of the FDA's analysis of the costs and benefits of the graphic warning label regulation.

Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE, Acemoğlu D, Gruber J, Laux F, Max W, Newhouse J, Schelling T, Sindelar J.

Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):112-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052022. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

9.

Public support for graphic health warning labels in the U.S.

Kamyab K, Nonnemaker JM, Farrelly MC.

Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.032. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

PMID:
25217818
10.

Was the media campaign that supported Australia's new pictorial cigarette warning labels and plain packaging policy associated with more attention to and talking about warning labels?

Nagelhout GE, Osman A, Yong HH, Huang LL, Borland R, Thrasher JF.

Addict Behav. 2015 Oct;49:64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

11.

Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities.

Hammond D.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jan;14(1):62-74. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr182. Epub 2011 Oct 29. Review.

12.

Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

Thrasher JF, Carpenter MJ, Andrews JO, Gray KM, Alberg AJ, Navarro A, Friedman DB, Cummings KM.

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.025.

13.

Required warnings for cigarette packages and advertisements. Final rule.

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

Fed Regist. 2011 Jun 22;76(120):36628-777.

14.
15.

Influence of Cigarette Package Brand on the Emotional Impact of Tobacco-Warning Images That Cover 30% of Cigarette Packs in Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Gantiva C, Guerrero L, Rico A, Ramírez N, Díaz M, González M, Romo-González T.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1324-30. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv257. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

PMID:
26574553
16.

Impact of Australia's introduction of tobacco plain packs on adult smokers' pack-related perceptions and responses: results from a continuous tracking survey.

Dunlop SM, Dobbins T, Young JM, Perez D, Currow DC.

BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 18;4(12):e005836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005836. Erratum in: BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e005836corr1.

17.

Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues.

Wang AL, Romer D, Elman I, Turetsky BI, Gur RC, Langleben DD.

Addict Biol. 2015 Mar;20(2):368-76. doi: 10.1111/adb.12117. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

18.

The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: a qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers.

Mead EL, Cohen JE, Kennedy CE, Gallo J, Latkin CA.

BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 7;15:92. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1438-6.

19.

Smokers come to accept plain cigarette packaging, Australian study shows.

Wise J.

BMJ. 2014 Nov 10;349:g6717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6717. No abstract available.

PMID:
25389087
20.

Reactions to graphic health warnings in the United States.

Nonnemaker JM, Choiniere CJ, Farrelly MC, Kamyab K, Davis KC.

Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):46-56. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu036. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

PMID:
24974219

Supplemental Content

Support Center