Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 90

1.

The politics of the face-in-the-crowd.

Mills M, Smith KB, Hibbing JR, Dodd MD.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1199-213. doi: 10.1037/a0035177. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

PMID:
24294865
2.

In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search.

Savage RA, Lipp OV, Craig BM, Becker SI, Horstmann G.

Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):758-68. doi: 10.1037/a0031970. Epub 2013 Mar 25.

PMID:
23527503
3.

Anger superiority effect for change detection and change blindness.

Lyyra P, Hietanen JK, Astikainen P.

Conscious Cogn. 2014 Nov;30:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

PMID:
25129035
4.

Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?

Shasteen JR, Sasson NJ, Pinkham AE.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e93914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093914. eCollection 2014.

5.

Of toothy grins and angry snarls--open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces.

Horstmann G, Lipp OV, Becker SI.

J Vis. 2012 May 25;12(5):7. doi: 10.1167/12.5.7.

PMID:
22637708
6.

Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions.

Hahn S, Gronlund SD.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):159-65.

PMID:
17546747
7.

The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.

Pinkham AE, Griffin M, Baron R, Sasson NJ, Gur RC.

Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):141-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017387.

PMID:
20141311
8.

No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions.

Lipp OV, Price SM, Tellegen CL.

Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):248-59. doi: 10.1037/a0014715.

PMID:
19348536
9.

The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions.

Moriya J, Koster EH, De Raedt R.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1874-90. doi: 10.1037/a0037295. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

PMID:
24999613
10.

Attentional biases using the body in the crowd task: are angry body postures detected more rapidly?

Gilbert T, Martin R, Coulson M.

Cogn Emot. 2011 Jun;25(4):700-8. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.495881.

PMID:
21547770
11.

The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):381-96.

PMID:
11300573
12.
13.

The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks.

Becker DV, Anderson US, Mortensen CR, Neufeld SL, Neel R.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):637-59. doi: 10.1037/a0024060. Review.

PMID:
21744984
14.

Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.

Huang SL, Chang YC, Chen YJ.

Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):544-52. doi: 10.1037/a0022763.

PMID:
21517157
15.

Angry faces are special too: evidence from the visual scanpath.

Bate S, Haslam C, Hodgson TL.

Neuropsychology. 2009 Sep;23(5):658-67. doi: 10.1037/a0014518.

PMID:
19702419
16.

Violent media consumption and the recognition of dynamic facial expressions.

Kirsh SJ, Mounts JR, Olczak PV.

J Interpers Violence. 2006 May;21(5):571-84.

PMID:
16574633
17.

A threat-detection advantage in those with autism spectrum disorders.

Krysko KM, Rutherford MD.

Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

PMID:
19036491
18.

The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration.

Craig BM, Mallan KM, Lipp OV.

Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1303-14. doi: 10.1037/a0028622. Epub 2012 May 28.

PMID:
22642347
19.
20.

Aging and visual search: automatic and controlled attentional bias to threat faces.

Hahn S, Carlson C, Singer S, Gronlund SD.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Nov;123(3):312-36. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

PMID:
16524554

Supplemental Content

Support Center