Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 255

1.

Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the danish registry of knee ligament reconstruction.

Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind M.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):278-84. doi: 10.1177/0363546513509220. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

PMID:
24275859
2.

Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012.

Persson A, Fjeldsgaard K, Gjertsen JE, Kjellsen AB, Engebretsen L, Hole RM, Fevang JM.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):285-91. doi: 10.1177/0363546513511419. Epub 2013 Dec 9.

PMID:
24322979
3.

Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia.

Gifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Albrektsen G, Drogset JO.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2319-28. doi: 10.1177/0363546514548164. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

PMID:
25201444
4.

Age-Related Risk Factors for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 21,304 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Registry.

Maletis GB, Chen J, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT.

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):331-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546515614813. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

PMID:
26637284
5.

Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Andernord D, Desai N, Björnsson H, Ylander M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):121-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514552788. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

PMID:
25325560
6.

Registry data highlight increased revision rates for endobutton/biosure HA in ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: a nationwide cohort study from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry, 2004-2013.

Persson A, Kjellsen AB, Fjeldsgaard K, Engebretsen L, Espehaug B, Fevang JM.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2182-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546515584757. Epub 2015 May 14.

PMID:
25977524
7.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision.

Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Desmond JL, Funahashi TT.

Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):623-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30872.

PMID:
23632671
8.

Surgical Predictors of Early Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 Patients.

Andernord D, Björnsson H, Petzold M, Eriksson BI, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K.

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1574-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546514531396. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

PMID:
24778266
9.

Risk factors associated with revision and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry.

Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):641-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514561745. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

PMID:
25548148
10.

Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference.

Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Reynolds S, Desmond JL, Maletis MM, Funahashi TT.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1780-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490665. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

PMID:
23749343
11.

Revision Risk After Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Association With Graft Processing Techniques, Patient Characteristics, and Graft Type.

Tejwani SG, Chen J, Funahashi TT, Love R, Maletis GB.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2696-705. doi: 10.1177/0363546515589168. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

PMID:
26068037
12.

Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis.

Wagner M, Kääb MJ, Schallock J, Haas NP, Weiler A.

Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1327-36. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

PMID:
16002490
14.

Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan M, Samani J, Renström P.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep;84-A(9):1503-13.

PMID:
12208905
15.
17.

Do outcomes of outpatient ACL reconstruction vary with graft type?

Baverel L, Demey G, Odri GA, Leroy P, Saffarini M, Dejour D.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Nov;101(7):803-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

18.

Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.

Aga C, Kartus JT, Lind M, Lygre SHL, Granan LP, Engebretsen L.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5409-3. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28631112
19.

A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 3 anterior cruciate ligament graft types: bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, hamstring autograft, and allograft.

Genuario JW, Faucett SC, Boublik M, Schlegel TF.

Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):307-14. doi: 10.1177/0363546511426088. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

PMID:
22085728
20.

A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M.

Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1337-45. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

PMID:
16002487

Supplemental Content

Support Center