Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 142

1.

Measurement of maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm by angio-CT: reproducibility is better with the semi-automated method.

Mora C, Marcus C, Barbe C, Ecarnot F, Long A.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;47(2):139-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

2.
3.

Maximum Diameter of Native Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Measured by Angio-Computed Tomography: Reproducibility and Lack of Consensus Impacts on Clinical Decisions.

Mora CE, Marcus CD, Barbe CM, Ecarnot FB, Long AL.

Aorta (Stamford). 2015 Apr 1;3(2):47-55. doi: 10.12945/j.aorta.2015.14-059. eCollection 2015 Apr.

4.

Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Bredahl K, Sandholt B, Lönn L, Rouet L, Ardon R, Eiberg JP, Sillesen H.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

5.

Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.

Hyhlik-Dürr A, Krieger T, Geisbüsch P, Kotelis D, Able T, Böckler D.

J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):289-98. doi: 10.1583/10-3384MR.1.

PMID:
21679063
6.

Contrast inhomogeneity in CT angiography of the abdominal aortic aneurysm.

George E, Giannopoulos AA, Aghayev A, Rohatgi S, Imanzadeh A, Antoniadis AP, Kumamaru KK, Chatzizisis YS, Dunne R, Steigner M, Hanley M, Gravereaux EC, Rybicki FJ, Mitsouras D.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;10(2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

7.

Three-dimensional workstation is useful for measuring the correct size of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters.

Ihara T, Komori K, Yamamoto K, Kobayashi M, Banno H, Kodama A.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;27(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

PMID:
22951061
8.

Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Corriere MA, Islam A, Craven TE, Conlee TD, Hurie JB, Edwards MS.

J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1224-31.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.003. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

9.

Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography.

Kauffmann C, Tang A, Dugas A, Therasse É, Oliva V, Soulez G.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Mar;77(3):502-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.027. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

PMID:
19962261
10.

St George's Vascular Institute Protocol: an accurate and reproducible methodology to enable comprehensive characterization of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology in clinical and research applications.

Ghatwary T, Karthikesalingam A, Patterson B, Hinchliffe R, Morgan R, Loftus I, Salem A, Thompson MM, Holt PJ.

J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;19(3):400-14. doi: 10.1583/11-3731MR.1.

PMID:
22788895
11.

Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software.

Kauffmann C, Tang A, Therasse E, Giroux MF, Elkouri S, Melanson P, Melanson B, Oliva VL, Soulez G.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1688-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.044. Epub 2011 May 20.

PMID:
21601403
12.

Analysis of the thoracic aorta using a semi-automated post processing tool.

Entezari P, Kino A, Honarmand AR, Galizia MS, Yang Y, Collins J, Yaghmai V, Carr JC.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 13.

PMID:
23680155
13.

Aortic Curvature Instead of Angulation Allows Improved Estimation of the True Aorto-iliac Trajectory.

Schuurmann RC, Kuster L, Slump CH, Vahl A, van den Heuvel DA, Ouriel K, de Vries JP.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;51(2):216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

14.

Discrepancies in determination of abdominal aortic aneurysms maximum diameter and growth rate, using axial and orhtogonal computed tomography measurements.

Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Gionis M, Papaharilaou Y, Ioannou CV.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Sep;82(9):1398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.031. Epub 2013 May 31.

PMID:
23727377
15.

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Pitoulias GA, Donas KP, Schulte S, Aslanidou EA, Papadimitriou DK.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Apr 1;52(3):317-23. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100229.

PMID:
21498369
16.

Multidimensional growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Martufi G, Auer M, Roy J, Swedenborg J, Sakalihasan N, Panuccio G, Gasser TC.

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):748-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.070. Epub 2013 Apr 21.

17.

Comparison of volume and diameter measurement in assessing small abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion examined using computed tomographic angiography.

Parr A, Jayaratne C, Buttner P, Golledge J.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

PMID:
20061105
18.

Validation of pre-procedural aortic aneurysm volume calculations to estimate procedural fill volume of endobags in endovascular aortic sealing.

Boersen JT, van den Ham LH, Heyligers JM, Vahl AC, Vriens PW, Reijnen MM, de Vries JP.

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):674-679. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.08820-0. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

PMID:
26173392
19.

Automated quantification of aortoaortic and aortoiliac angulation for computed tomographic angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms before endovascular repair: preliminary study.

Raman B, Raman R, Napel S, Rubin GD.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Nov;21(11):1746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

20.

CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.

Iezzi R, Dattesi R, Pirro F, Nestola M, Santoro M, Snider F, Bonomo L.

J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):280-8. doi: 10.1583/10-3261.1.

PMID:
21679062

Supplemental Content

Support Center