Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 88

1.

Effects of antiperspirant aluminum percent composition and mode of application on mock microcalcifications in mammography.

Mesurolle B, Ceccarelli J, Karp I, Sun S, El-Khoury M.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Feb;83(2):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Oct 27.

PMID:
24262976
2.

Clinical studies of sweat rate reduction by an over-the-counter soft-solid antiperspirant and comparison with a prescription antiperspirant product in male panelists.

Swaile DF, Elstun LT, Benzing KW.

Br J Dermatol. 2012 Mar;166 Suppl 1:22-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10786.x.

PMID:
22385032
3.
4.

Influence of climatic conditions on antiperspirant efficacy determined at different test areas.

Brandt M, Bielfeldt S, Springmann G, Wilhelm KP.

Skin Res Technol. 2008 May;14(2):213-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2007.00282.x.

PMID:
18412565
6.

In vitro study of percutaneous absorption of aluminum from antiperspirants through human skin in the Franz™ diffusion cell.

Pineau A, Guillard O, Favreau F, Marrauld A, Fauconneau B.

J Inorg Biochem. 2012 May;110:21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 25. Erratum in: J Inorg Biochem. 2012 Nov;116:228. Marty, Marie-Hélène [removed]; Gaudin, Angeline [removed]; Vincent, Claire Marie [removed]; Marty, Jean-Paul [removed].

PMID:
22459170
7.

[Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].

Bazzocchi M, Facecchia I, Zuiani C, Londero V, Smania S, Bottigli U, Delogu P.

Radiol Med. 2001 May;101(5):334-40. Italian.

PMID:
11438784
8.

Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.

Highnam R, Brady M, English R.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Oct;18(10):1016-24.

PMID:
10628960
9.

Optimal aluminum/zirconium: Protein interactions for predicting antiperspirant efficacy using zeta potential measurements.

Yuan S, Vaughn J, Pappas I, Fitzgerald M, Masters JG, Pan L.

J Cosmet Sci. 2015 Mar-Apr;66(2):95-111.

PMID:
26454974
10.

Aluminium and the human breast.

Darbre PD.

Morphologie. 2016 Jun;100(329):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
26997127
11.

Prevention of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia with an antiperspirant in breast cancer patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (SAKK 92/08).

Templeton AJ, Ribi K, Surber C, Sun H, Hsu Schmitz SF, Beyeler M, Dietrich D, Borner M, Winkler A, Müller A, von Rohr L, Winterhalder RC, Rochlitz C, von Moos R, Zaman K, Thürlimann BJ, Ruhstaller T; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center.

Breast. 2014 Jun;23(3):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

PMID:
24656636
12.

Feasibility study for the improvement of microcalcification visualization in different breast thicknesses and tissue components using a dual-energy approach in digital mammography.

Tsai CJ, Chen RC, Hung SH, Wu J, Peng HL, Lee JJ.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):488-94. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825c83c4.

PMID:
22805681
13.

[Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography].

Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Adamietz B, Lell M, Böhner C, Uder M, Bautz WA.

Rofo. 2007 May;179(5):492-6. German.

PMID:
17436183
14.

Aluminum concentrations in central and peripheral areas of malignant breast lesions do not differ from those in normal breast tissues.

Rodrigues-Peres RM, Cadore S, Febraio S, Heinrich JK, Serra KP, Derchain SF, Vassallo J, Sarian LO.

BMC Cancer. 2013 Mar 8;13:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-104.

15.

Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.

Shaw CC, Wang T, King JL, Breitenstein DS, Chang TS, Harris KM, Baratz AB, Ganott MA, Reginella R, Sumkin JH, Gur D.

Acad Radiol. 1998 Mar;5(3):173-80.

PMID:
9522883
16.

Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.

Carvajal J, Patiño JH.

Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Mar-Apr;28(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2007.12.008.

PMID:
19083521
17.

Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.

Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG.

Korean J Radiol. 2007 May-Jun;8(3):198-205.

18.

If exposure to aluminium in antiperspirants presents health risks, its content should be reduced.

Pineau A, Fauconneau B, Sappino AP, Deloncle R, Guillard O.

J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):147-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 19. Review.

PMID:
24418462
19.

Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.

Samei E, Saunders RS Jr, Baker JA, Delong DM.

Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):396-404. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

PMID:
17356178
20.

Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.

Kim MJ, Youk JH, Kang DR, Choi SH, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Kim EK.

Br J Radiol. 2010 Jun;83(990):486-92. doi: 10.1259/bjr/16967819. Epub 2009 Sep 14.

Supplemental Content

Support Center