Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 212

1.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale.

Panchapakesan V, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL.

Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1099-109. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13510170. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

PMID:
24243890
2.

Development and Psychometric Validation of the FACE-Q Skin, Lips, and Facial Rhytids Appearance Scales and Adverse Effects Checklists for Cosmetic Procedures.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, Baker SB, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Chapas A, Pusic AL.

JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Apr;152(4):443-51. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0018.

3.

FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: development and validation.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, Scott AM, Pusic AL.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):375-86. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000895.

PMID:
25626785
4.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q satisfaction with appearance scale: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for facial aesthetics patients.

Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ.

Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;40(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001.

PMID:
23506765
5.

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA, Baker SB, Badia L, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL.

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):27-35. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1445.

6.

The FACE-Q: the importance of full disclosure and sound methodology in outcome studies.

Swanson E.

Aesthet Surg J. 2014 May 1;34(4):626-7. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14528505. No abstract available.

PMID:
24755415
7.

Measuring outcomes that matter to face-lift patients: development and validation of FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan;133(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436814.11462.94.

PMID:
24105086
8.

Response to "The FACE-Q: the importance of full disclosure and sound methodology in outcomes studies".

Pusic A, Klassen A, Panchapakesan V, Cano S.

Aesthet Surg J. 2014 May 1;34(4):628-31. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14528509. No abstract available.

PMID:
24755416
9.

FACE-Q Eye Module for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cosmetic Eye Treatments.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Grotting JC, Baker SB, Carruthers J, Carruthers A, Van Laeken N, Sykes JM, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL.

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jan 1;19(1):7-14. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1018.

10.

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation.

Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, Scott AM, Wilkins EG, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Carr N, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jun;123(6):1819-27. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f361. Review.

PMID:
19483584
11.

Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL.

Facial Plast Surg. 2010 Aug;26(4):303-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262313. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

PMID:
20665408
12.

Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire.

Pompilus F, Burgess S, Hudgens S, Banderas B, Daniels S.

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Dec;14(4):274-85. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12166. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

PMID:
26264134
13.

Self-Report Scales to Measure Expectations and Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress in Patients Seeking Cosmetic Treatments.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Alderman A, East C, Badia L, Baker SB, Robson S, Pusic AL.

Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Oct;36(9):1068-78. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw078. Epub 2016 May 24.

14.

Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction after body contouring: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Reavey PL, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, McCarthy C, Scott A, Rubin JP, Shermak M, Pusic AL.

Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Sep;31(7):807-13. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11417426.

PMID:
21908812
15.

Assessing Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Appearance and Quality of Life following Rhinoplasty Using the FACE-Q Appraisal Scales.

Schwitzer JA, Sher SR, Fan KL, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May;135(5):830e-837e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001159.

PMID:
25919265
16.

Patient Perceived Benefit in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: FACE-Q as a Tool to Study Botulinum Toxin Injection Outcomes.

Chang BL, Wilson AJ, Taglienti AJ, Chang CS, Folsom N, Percec I.

Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jul;36(7):810-20. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv244. Epub 2016 Jan 17.

PMID:
26780945
18.

FACE-Q Scales for Health-Related Quality of Life, Early Life Impact and Satisfaction with Outcomes and Decision to Have Treatment: Development and Validation.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer J, Scott A, Pusic AL.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct 29. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25357161
19.

Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q.

Kappos EA, Temp M, Schaefer DJ, Haug M, Kalbermatten DF, Toth BA.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):839-845. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003164.

PMID:
28002252
20.

Assessing outcomes in body contouring.

Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Tsangaris E, Pusic AL.

Clin Plast Surg. 2014 Oct;41(4):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.06.004. Review.

PMID:
25283452

Supplemental Content

Support Center