Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 155

1.

Incorporating conservation zone effectiveness for protecting biodiversity in marine planning.

Makino A, Klein CJ, Beger M, Jupiter SD, Possingham HP.

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 4;8(11):e78986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078986. eCollection 2013.

2.

Ocean zoning for conservation, fisheries and marine renewable energy: assessing trade-offs and co-location opportunities.

Yates KL, Schoeman DS, Klein CJ.

J Environ Manage. 2015 Apr 1;152:201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.045. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

PMID:
25684567
3.

Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning.

Gurney GG, Pressey RL, Ban NC, Álvarez-Romero JG, Jupiter S, Adams VM.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Oct;29(5):1378-89. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12514. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

PMID:
25916976
4.

Quantifying the spatial ecology of wide-ranging marine species in the Gulf of California: implications for marine conservation planning.

Anadón JD, D'Agrosa C, Gondor A, Gerber LR.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028400. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

5.

Accounting for enforcement costs in the spatial allocation of marine zones.

Davis K, Kragt M, Gelcich S, Schilizzi S, Pannell D.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Feb;29(1):226-37. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12358. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

PMID:
25103090
6.

Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas.

Klein CJ, Chan A, Kircher L, Cundiff AJ, Gardner N, Hrovat Y, Scholz A, Kendall BE, Airamé S.

Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):691-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00896.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18325043
7.

Accommodating dynamic oceanographic processes and pelagic biodiversity in marine conservation planning.

Grantham HS, Game ET, Lombard AT, Hobday AJ, Richardson AJ, Beckley LE, Pressey RL, Huggett JA, Coetzee JC, van der Lingen CD, Petersen SL, Merkle D, Possingham HP.

PLoS One. 2011 Feb 2;6(2):e16552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016552.

8.

Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.

Schröter M, Rusch GM, Barton DN, Blumentrath S, Nordén B.

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112557. eCollection 2014.

9.

Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves.

McCook LJ, Ayling T, Cappo M, Choat JH, Evans RD, De Freitas DM, Heupel M, Hughes TP, Jones GP, Mapstone B, Marsh H, Mills M, Molloy FJ, Pitcher CR, Pressey RL, Russ GR, Sutton S, Sweatman H, Tobin R, Wachenfeld DR, Williamson DH.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18278-85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909335107. Epub 2010 Feb 22.

10.

An ecosystem evaluation framework for global seamount conservation and management.

Taranto GH, Kvile KØ, Pitcher TJ, Morato T.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042950. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

11.

Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.

Metcalfe K, Vaughan G, Vaz S, Smith RJ.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Dec;29(6):1615-25. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12571. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

PMID:
26219669
12.

Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Gaines SD, White C, Carr MH, Palumbi SR.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18286-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906473107. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

13.

Comparison of marine spatial planning methods in Madagascar demonstrates value of alternative approaches.

Allnutt TF, McClanahan TR, Andréfouët S, Baker M, Lagabrielle E, McClennen C, Rakotomanjaka AJ, Tianarisoa TF, Watson R, Kremen C.

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e28969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028969. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

14.

Marine no-take zone rapidly benefits endangered penguin.

Pichegru L, Grémillet D, Crawford RJ, Ryan PG.

Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):498-501. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0913. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

15.

The seascape of demersal fish nursery areas in the North Mediterranean Sea, a first step towards the implementation of spatial planning for trawl fisheries.

Colloca F, Garofalo G, Bitetto I, Facchini MT, Grati F, Martiradonna A, Mastrantonio G, Nikolioudakis N, Ordinas F, Scarcella G, Tserpes G, Tugores MP, Valavanis V, Carlucci R, Fiorentino F, Follesa MC, Iglesias M, Knittweis L, Lefkaditou E, Lembo G, Manfredi C, Massutí E, Pace ML, Papadopoulou N, Sartor P, Smith CJ, Spedicato MT.

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119590. eCollection 2015.

16.

Evolution of a Mediterranean coastal zone: human impacts on the marine environment of Cape Creus.

Lloret J, Riera V.

Environ Manage. 2008 Dec;42(6):977-88. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9196-1. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

PMID:
18800202
17.

Marine Reserve Targets to Sustain and Rebuild Unregulated Fisheries.

Krueck NC, Ahmadia GN, Possingham HP, Riginos C, Treml EA, Mumby PJ.

PLoS Biol. 2017 Jan 5;15(1):e2000537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000537. eCollection 2017 Jan.

18.

Forest conservation delivers highly variable coral reef conservation outcomes.

Klein CJ, Jupiter SD, Selig ER, Watts ME, Halpern BS, Kamal M, Roelfsema C, Possingham HP.

Ecol Appl. 2012 Jun;22(4):1246-56.

PMID:
22827132
19.

New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning.

Douvere F, Ehler CN.

J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Review.

PMID:
18786758
20.

Assessing fishing and marine biodiversity changes using fishers' perceptions: the Spanish Mediterranean and Gulf of Cadiz case study.

Coll M, Carreras M, Ciércoles C, Cornax MJ, Gorelli G, Morote E, Sáez R.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085670. eCollection 2014.

Supplemental Content

Support Center