Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 618

1.

[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].

Otsuki H, Kuwahara Y, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto T.

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. Japanese.

PMID:
24187850
2.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749852
3.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
4.

Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.

Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O.

BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x. Epub 2009 May 5.

5.

Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.

Boris RS, Kaul SA, Sarle RC, Stricker HJ.

Can J Urol. 2007 Jun;14(3):3566-70.

PMID:
17594747
6.

Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT.

BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

7.

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21612859
8.

A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team.

BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):205-10.

9.

Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, Ragni F, Poggio M, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22840353
10.

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.

Papachristos A, Basto M, Te Marvelde L, Moon D.

ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):154-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12602. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

PMID:
24730750
11.

Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery.

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Lynch JH, Hu JC.

World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):515-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0973-3. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

PMID:
23135639
12.

How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?

Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR.

BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E314-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11493.x. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

13.

Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Park J, Yoo DS, Song C, Park S, Park S, Kim SC, Cho Y, Ahn H.

World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1168-2. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

PMID:
24062092
14.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
19185977
15.
16.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR.

J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2003-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0295. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Review.

17.

Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Huang X, Wang L, Zheng X, Wang X.

Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1045-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5125-1. Epub 2016 Jul 21. Review.

PMID:
27444830
18.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):431-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
22749853
19.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR, Van der Poel H, Rosen RC, Tewari AK, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Montorsi F.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749850
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center