Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 61

1.

Surface replacement conversion: results depend upon reason for revision.

Su EP, Su SL.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):88-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32663.

PMID:
24187361
2.

Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Engesæter LB, Dale H, Schrama JC, Hallan G, Lie SA.

Acta Orthop. 2011 Oct;82(5):530-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.623572.

3.

Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Prosser GH, Graves SE, Davidson DC, Stanford TE.

Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):72-6. doi: 10.3109/17453671003667176.

4.

The use of a long stem cemented femoral component in revision total hip replacement: a follow-up study of five to 16 years.

Te Stroet MA, Bronsema E, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW.

Bone Joint J. 2014 Sep;96-B(9):1207-13. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.33304.

PMID:
25183592
5.

Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four to seven-year results.

Dorr LD, Wan Z, Longjohn DB, Dubois B, Murken R.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jun;82(6):789-98.

PMID:
10859098
6.

Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 20;95(6):543-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00758.

PMID:
23515989
7.

Septic versus aseptic hip revision: how different?

Romanò CL, Romanò D, Logoluso N, Meani E.

J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Sep;11(3):167-74. doi: 10.1007/s10195-010-0106-y. Epub 2010 Sep 2.

8.

[Polyethylene liner replacement: behavior and morbidity in 68 cases].

Bidar R, Girard J, May O, Pinoit Y, Laffargue P, Migaud H.

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 Sep;93(5):461-8. French.

PMID:
17878837
9.

Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.

Sah AP, Estok DM 2nd.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):506-16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00479.

PMID:
18310700
10.

[Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].

Trč T, Stastný E.

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):506-11. Czech.

PMID:
23286682
11.

Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the Spongiosa-I fully coated cancellous metal surface: a minimum twenty-year follow-up.

Al Muderis M, Bohling U, Grittner U, Gerdesmeyer L, Scholz J.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jun 1;93(11):1039-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01757.

PMID:
21655897
12.

Dual-mobility cups for revision due to instability are associated with a low rate of re-revisions due to dislocation: 228 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J.

Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):566-71. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.742395. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

13.

Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.

Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS, Delanois RE, Mont MA.

Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):116-9.

14.

Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.

Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):1655-61.

15.

Retention of all-polyethylene acetabular components after femoral revision of a cemented total hip replacement.

Hamlin BR, Rowland C, Morrey BF.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Nov;83-A(11):1700-5.

PMID:
11701794
16.

Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

Milošev I, Kovač S, Trebše R, Levašič V, Pišot V.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.

PMID:
23032586
17.

Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip.

Pellegrini VD Jr, Heiges BA, Bixler B, Lehman EB, Davis CM 3rd.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1817-25.

PMID:
16882907
18.

Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.

Khatod M, Cafri G, Inacio MC, Schepps AL, Paxton EW, Bini SA.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Mar 4;97(5):359-66. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00073.

PMID:
25740025
19.

Short-term Results of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in the United States.

Nam D, Nunley RM, Ruh EL, Engh CA Jr, Rogerson JS, Brooks PJ, Raterman SJ, Su EP, Barrack RL.

Orthopedics. 2015 Aug;38(8):e715-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150804-60.

PMID:
26270759
20.

Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.

Bardou-Jacquet J, Souillac V, Mouton A, Chauveaux D.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.

Supplemental Content

Support Center