Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

Impact of mating design on selection response in Brassica rapa L.

Lascoux M, Kang H, Svärd H.

Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Nov;89(6):751-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00223715.

PMID:
24178021
2.

EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?

Tonsor SJ, Goodnight CJ.

Evolution. 1997 Dec;51(6):1773-1784. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05101.x.

PMID:
28565103
3.

Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.

Hely FS, Amer PR, Walker SP, Symonds JE.

Animal. 2013 Jan;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001371. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

PMID:
23031385
4.

Comparative genetic analyses of metric traits using diallel and factorial mating designs in bread wheat.

Virk DS, Khehra AS, Virk PS, Dhillon BS.

Theor Appl Genet. 1985 May;69(3):325-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00662454.

PMID:
24253828
5.

A comparison of four experimental designs for the estimation of heritability.

Pederson DG.

Theor Appl Genet. 1972 Jan;42(8):371-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00275364.

PMID:
24429492
6.

Population size and selection intensity effects on short-term response for a selection index in Tribolium.

Campo JL, Turrado H.

J Anim Breed Genet. 1997 Jan 12;114(1-6):107-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1997.tb00498.x.

PMID:
21395808
7.
8.

Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection.

Sánchez Rodríguez L.

Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Jun;84 ( Pt 6):685-91.

PMID:
10886384
9.
10.

Artificial selection on trichome number in Brassica rapa.

Agren J, Schemske DW.

Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Apr;83(6-7):673-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00226683.

PMID:
24202739
11.

Effective size of populations under selection.

Santiago E, Caballero A.

Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1013-30.

12.

Limits of artificial selection under unbalanced mating systems.

Kang H, Namkoong G.

Theor Appl Genet. 1980 May;58(3-4):181-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00263115.

PMID:
24301351
13.

The effects of mating design on introgression between chromosomally divergent sunflower species.

Rieseberg LH, Arias DM, Ungerer MC, Linder CR, Sinervo B.

Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Sep;93(4):633-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00417959.

PMID:
24162359
14.
15.

Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions.

Brisbane JR, Gibson JP.

Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Aug;91(3):421-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00222969.

PMID:
24169831
16.

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.

Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24782322
17.

Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.

Nirea KG, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH.

Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Apr 11;44:11. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-11.

18.

EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE IN BRASSICA RAPA: CORRELATED RESPONSE OF TOLERANCE IN LINES SELECTED FOR GLUCOSINOLATE CONTENT.

Stowe KA.

Evolution. 1998 Jun;52(3):703-712. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03695.x.

PMID:
28565253
19.

Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.

Sonesson AK, Ødegård J.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 24;48(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0224-y.

20.

Hierarchical and factorial mating designs for quantitative genetic analysis in tetrasomic potato.

Ortiz R, Golmirzaie A.

Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Mar;104(4):675-679.

PMID:
12582673

Supplemental Content

Support Center