Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 256

2.

Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Kern SQ, Lustik MB, McMann LP, Thibault GP, Sterbis JR.

J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):40-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0051. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

PMID:
24007345
3.

Contemporary practice and technique-related outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the UK: a report of national outcomes.

Laird A, Fowler S, Good DW, Stewart GD, Srinivasan V, Cahill D, Brewster SF, McNeill SA; British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS).

BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):753-63. doi: 10.1111/bju.12866. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

5.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.

Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI.

Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22206800
6.

Perioperative outcomes of open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Asian men: comparison of two initial series by the same surgeon.

Leewansangtong S, Wiangsakunna W, Taweemankongsap T.

Int Braz J Urol. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):151-6; discussion 156-7.

7.

Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.

Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P.

Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24. Review.

PMID:
22405509
8.

[Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a French center experience].

Verdier E, Doré B, Fromont G, Pirès C, Lecoq B, Dezael JC, Irani J.

Prog Urol. 2014 Mar;24(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.08.313. Epub 2013 Sep 27. French.

PMID:
24560206
9.

Comparison of outcomes after TURP versus photoselective vaporization of the prostate with respect to trainee involvement utilizing ACS NSQIP.

Olcese SP, Derosa R, Kern SQ, Lustik MB, Sterbis JR, McMann LP.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014 Sep;17(3):227-32. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2014.13. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

PMID:
24732080
10.

Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI.

Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):579-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

PMID:
23876584
11.

Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.

Davis JW, Kreaden US, Gabbert J, Thomas R.

J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):560-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0534. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

12.

Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HA, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T, Ho Thi P, Dietel A, Liatsikos E, Do M.

J Endourol. 2013 Jan;27(1):80-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0262. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

PMID:
22834963
13.

Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: pathologic outcomes and Kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent.

Park S, Jaffer O, Lotan Y, Saboorian H, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA.

Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):118-22.

PMID:
17270631
14.

Prospective comparison of scar-related satisfaction and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: no differences from patients' point of view.

Delongchamps NB, Belas O, Saighi D, Zerbib M, Peyromaure M.

World J Urol. 2013 Apr;31(2):389-93. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0862-9. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

PMID:
22481294
15.

Utilization and timing of blood transfusions following open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Korets R, Weinberg AC, Alberts BD, Woldu SL, Mann MJ, Badani KK.

J Endourol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1418-23. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0225.

PMID:
25333318
16.

Resident participation in laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact of trainee involvement on operative times and surgical outcomes.

Igwe E, Hernandez E, Rose S, Uppal S.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):484.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

PMID:
24949539
17.

[Comparison between open and laparoscopic approach in radical prostatectomy].

Raventós Busquets CX, Gómez Lanza E, Cecchini Rosell L, Trilla Herrera E, Orsola los de Santos A, Planas Morin J, De Torre Ramírez I, Morote Robles J.

Actas Urol Esp. 2007 Feb;31(2):141-5. Spanish.

PMID:
17645093
18.
19.

Resident involvement and experience do not affect perioperative complications following robotic prostatectomy.

McMillan DT, Viera AJ, Matthews J, Raynor MC, Woods ME, Pruthi RS, Wallen EM, Nielsen ME, Smith AB.

World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):793-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1356-8. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center