Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 142

1.

An overview of the health economic implications of elective caesarean section.

Petrou S, Khan K.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):561-76. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0063-8. Review.

PMID:
24155076
2.

Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.

Golfier F, Vaudoyer F, Ecochard R, Champion F, Audra P, Raudrant D.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Oct;98(2):186-92.

PMID:
11574129
3.

The cost-effectiveness of elective Cesarean delivery for HIV-infected women with detectable HIV RNA during pregnancy.

Mrus JM, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC, Tsevat J.

AIDS. 2000 Nov 10;14(16):2543-52.

PMID:
11101066
5.

Trial of labour versus elective repeat caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Shorten A, Lewis DE, Shorten B.

Aust Health Rev. 1998;21(1):8-28.

PMID:
10181675
6.

Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations.

Irion O, Hirsbrunner Almagbaly P, Morabia A.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;105(7):710-7.

PMID:
9692410
7.

At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery.

Fawsitt CG, Bourke J, Greene RA, Everard CM, Murphy A, Lutomski JE.

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058577. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

9.
10.

Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial.

Su M, Hannah WJ, Willan A, Ross S, Hannah ME; Term Breech Trial collaborative group.

BJOG. 2004 Oct;111(10):1065-74.

11.

Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth.

Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD004224. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD004224.

PMID:
15495090
12.

[Gentle obstetrical management for very early preterm deliveries].

Schneider H.

Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2004 Jan;44(1):10-18. Review. German.

PMID:
14673223
13.

Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.

Patel RR, Peters TJ, Murphy DJ; ALSPAC Study Team.

Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):353-67. Epub 2005 Jan 19.

PMID:
15659468
14.

Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.

Martel MJ, MacKinnon CJ; Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. English, French.

PMID:
15943001
15.

Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study.

Karlström A, Lindgren H, Hildingsson I.

BJOG. 2013 Mar;120(4):479-86; discussion 486. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12129. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

16.

Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth.

Dodd JM, Crowther CA.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD004906. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD004906.

PMID:
17054224
17.

Risk of complications in a second pregnancy following caesarean section in the first pregnancy: a population-based study.

Taylor LK, Simpson JM, Roberts CL, Olive EC, Henderson-Smart DJ.

Med J Aust. 2005 Nov 21;183(10):515-9.

PMID:
16296964
19.
20.

Trial of labour compared to elective Caesarean in twin gestations with a previous Caesarean delivery.

Delaney T, Young DC.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Apr;25(4):289-92.

PMID:
12679820

Supplemental Content

Support Center