Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132


Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.

White RR, Brady M, Capper JL, McNamara JP, Johnson KA.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Jun;93(6):3197-211. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8800.


The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.

Capper JL, Hayes DJ.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3527-37. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4870.


A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.

Rotz CA, Isenberg BJ, Stackhouse-Lawson KR, Pollak EJ.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5427-37. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6506.


Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.

Stackhouse-Lawson KR, Rotz CA, Oltjen JW, Mitloehner FM.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4641-55. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4653.


Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.

Nguyen TT, Doreau M, Eugène M, Corson MS, Garcia-Launay F, Chesneau G, van der Werf HM.

Animal. 2013 May;7(5):860-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002200.


Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.

Stackhouse KR, Rotz CA, Oltjen JW, Mitloehner FM.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4656-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4654.


An evaluation of production and economic efficiency of two beef systems from calving to slaughter.

Anderson RV, Rasby RJ, Klopfenstein TJ, Clark RT.

J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):694-704.


Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: I. Animal performance and carcass characteristics.

Neel JP, Fontenot JP, Clapham WM, Duckett SK, Felton EE, Scaglia G, Bryan WB.

J Anim Sci. 2007 Aug;85(8):2012-8.


Identifying differences in feed efficiency among group-fed cattle.

Tedeschi LO, Fox DG, Baker MJ, Kirschten DP.

J Anim Sci. 2006 Mar;84(3):767-76.


Cradle-to-farm gate environmental footprints of beef cattle production in Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Rotz CA, Asem-Hiablie S, Dillon J, Bonifacio H.

J Anim Sci. 2015 May;93(5):2509-19. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8809.


The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.

Capper JL.

J Anim Sci. 2011 Dec;89(12):4249-61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3784.


Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.

Zehetmeier M, Baudracco J, Hoffmann H, Heißenhuber A.

Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):154-66. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001467.


Relationship among performance, carcass, and feed efficiency characteristics, and their ability to predict economic value in the feedlot.

Retallick KM, Faulkner DB, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Nkrumah JD, Shike DW.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Dec;91(12):5954-61. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6156.


2011 and 2012 Early Careers Achievement Awards: improving the production, environmental, and economic efficiency of the stocker cattle industry in the southeastern United States.

Beck PA, Anders M, Watkins B, Gunter SA, Hubbell D, Gadberry MS.

J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2456-66. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5873. Review.


Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies.

Pyatt NA, Berger LL, Faulkner DB, Walker PM, Rodriguez-Zas SL.

J Anim Sci. 2005 Dec;83(12):2926-37.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center