Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 115

1.

Detection of EMG-based muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contraction using a monopolar configuration.

Hotta Y, Ito K.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:2140-3. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609957.

PMID:
24110144
2.

Surface electromyogram-based detection of muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contraction under blood flow restriction.

Ito K, Hotta Y.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2205-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944056.

PMID:
25570424
3.

EMG-based detection of muscle fatigue during low-level isometric contraction by recurrence quantification analysis and monopolar configuration.

Ito K, Hotta Y.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4237-41. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346902.

PMID:
23366863
4.

EMG-based detection of muscle fatigue during low-level isometric contraction: effects of electrode configuration and blood flow restriction.

Hotta Y, Ito K.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:3877-9. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090963.

PMID:
22255186
5.

Motor unit synchronization during fatigue: described with a novel sEMG method based on large motor unit samples.

Holtermann A, Grönlund C, Karlsson JS, Roeleveld K.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Apr;19(2):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.08.008. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

PMID:
18207421
6.
7.

Influence of fatigue on the simulated relation between the amplitude of the surface electromyogram and muscle force.

Dideriksen JL, Farina D, Enoka RM.

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010 Jun 13;368(1920):2765-81. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0094.

8.

Fuzzy approximate entropy analysis of chaotic and natural complex systems: detecting muscle fatigue using electromyography signals.

Xie HB, Guo JY, Zheng YP.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Apr;38(4):1483-96. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-9933-5. Epub 2010 Jan 23.

PMID:
20099031
9.

EMG spectral indices and muscle power fatigue during dynamic contractions.

González-Izal M, Malanda A, Navarro-Amézqueta I, Gorostiaga EM, Mallor F, Ibañez J, Izquierdo M.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

PMID:
19406664
10.

Repeatability of surface EMG parameters at various isometric contraction levels and during fatigue using bipolar and Laplacian electrode configurations.

Ollivier K, Portero P, Maïsetti O, Hogrel JY.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005 Oct;15(5):466-73. Epub 2005 Feb 24.

PMID:
15935958
11.
12.

A new EMG frequency-based fatigue threshold test.

Hendrix CR, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Mielke M, Camic CL, Zuniga JM, Schmidt RJ.

J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jun 30;181(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 Apr 24.

PMID:
19394361
13.

Evaluation of measurement strategies to increase the reliability of EMG indices to assess back muscle fatigue and recovery.

Larivière C, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Gagnon D, Loisel P.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):91-102.

PMID:
11955981
14.

Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.

Farina D, Pozzo M, Merlo E, Bottin A, Merletti R.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Aug;51(8):1383-93.

PMID:
15311823
15.

EMG amplitude and frequency parameters of muscular activity: effect of resistance training based on electromyographic fatigue threshold.

Oliveira Ade S, Gonçalves M.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Apr;19(2):295-303. Epub 2007 Sep 29.

PMID:
17904865
16.

Muscle fatigue detection during dynamic contraction under blood flow restriction: Improvement of detection sensitivity using multivariable fatigue indices.

Ito K, Kourakata Y, Hotta Y.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:6078-81. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319778.

PMID:
26737678
17.

The effects of innervation zone on electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during incremental cycle ergometry.

Malek MH, Coburn JW, Weir JP, Beck TW, Housh TJ.

J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Jul 15;155(1):126-33. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

PMID:
16510193
18.

A comparison of EMG-based muscle fatigue assessments during dynamic contractions.

Rogers DR, MacIsaac DT.

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Oct;23(5):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 22.

PMID:
23800437
19.

An examination of the linearity and reliability of the electromyographic amplitude versus dynamic constant external resistance relationships using monopolar and bipolar recording methods.

Stock MS, Beck TW, Defreitas JM, Dillon MA.

J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Dec 15;194(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

PMID:
20888861
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center