Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 200

2.

Additional value of adenosine-stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging in the reclassification of severity of coronary artery stenosis at coronary CT angiography.

Kim SM, Choi JH, Chang SA, Choe YH.

Clin Radiol. 2013 Dec;68(12):e659-68. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

PMID:
24034545
3.

Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Choo KS, Hwangbo L, Kim JH, Park YH, Kim JS, Kim J, Chun KJ, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.

Acta Radiol. 2013 May;54(4):389-95. doi: 10.1177/0284185113475440. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23550182
4.

Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):540-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961250. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

5.
6.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Budoff MJ, Li D, Kazerooni EA, Thomas GS, Mieres JH, Shaw LJ.

Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

PMID:
27771227
7.

Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience.

Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ.

Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):306-13. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa2f2.

PMID:
20421800
8.

Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging.

Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, Blankstein R, Hoffmann U, Sommer WH, Hoffmann VS, Johnson TR, Becker HC, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K.

Radiology. 2011 Sep;260(3):689-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110638.

PMID:
21846761
9.

Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.

Osawa K, Miyoshi T, Miki T, Koyama Y, Sato S, Kanazawa S, Ito H.

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0149170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149170. eCollection 2016.

10.

Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.

Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Rocha-Filho JA, Okada DR, Sarwar A, Soni AV, Bezerra H, Ghoshhajra BB, Petranovic M, Loureiro R, Feuchtner G, Gewirtz H, Hoffmann U, Mamuya WS, Brady TJ, Cury RC.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 15;54(12):1072-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014.

12.

Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: direct comparison with cardiovascular MRI.

Ko SM, Song MG, Chee HK, Hwang HK, Feuchtner GM, Min JK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W605-13. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12644.

13.

Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, Crossett M, Troupis J, Harper R, Malaiapan Y, Seneviratne SK.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1097-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004.

14.

Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model.

Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, Sandner TA, Baloch E, Marcus R, Becker A, Kupatt C, Wintersperger BJ, Johnson TR, Theisen D, Klotz E, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K.

Invest Radiol. 2012 Jan;47(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823fd42b.

PMID:
22178894
15.

Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Ko BS, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Leung M, Antonis PR, Nasis A, Crossett M, Hope SA, Lehman SJ, Troupis J, DeFrance T, Seneviratne SK.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

PMID:
21810860
16.
17.

Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging.

Bamberg F, Marcus RP, Becker A, Hildebrandt K, Bauner K, Schwarz F, Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bischoff B, Becker HC, Johnson TR, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K, Theisen D.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.06.008. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

18.

Utility of coronary CT angiography in outpatients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy presenting with angina symptoms.

Shariat M, Thavendiranathan P, Nguyen E, Wintersperger B, Paul N, Rakowski H, Crean AM.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):429-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

PMID:
25467830
19.
20.

Direct comparison of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography for detection of myocardial perfusion defect.

Ko SM, Park JH, Hwang HK, Song MG.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;30 Suppl 1:41-53. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0410-3. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

PMID:
24696012

Supplemental Content

Support Center