Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 177

1.

Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability.

Guillaume M, Nys J, Mussolin C, Content A.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Nov;144(3):506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

PMID:
24096088
2.

Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children.

Smets K, Gebuis T, Defever E, Reynvoet B.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 27.

PMID:
24875582
3.

Indexing the approximate number system.

Inglis M, Gilmore C.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jan;145:147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

PMID:
24361686
4.

Sampling from the mental number line: how are approximate number system representations formed?

Inglis M, Gilmore C.

Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

PMID:
23831565
5.

Individual differences in inhibitory control, not non-verbal number acuity, correlate with mathematics achievement.

Gilmore C, Attridge N, Clayton S, Cragg L, Johnson S, Marlow N, Simms V, Inglis M.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e67374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067374. Print 2013.

6.

Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.

Price GR, Palmer D, Battista C, Ansari D.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 May;140(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

PMID:
22445770
7.

Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance.

Matthews PG, Lewis MR, Hubbard EM.

Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb;27(2):191-202. doi: 10.1177/0956797615617799. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

PMID:
26710824
8.

Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence.

Lyons IM, Beilock SL.

Cognition. 2011 Nov;121(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

PMID:
21855058
9.

How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.

Chesney D, Bjalkebring P, Peters E.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2781-802. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0974-6.

PMID:
26335207
10.

Aging and the number sense: preserved basic non-symbolic numerical processing and enhanced basic symbolic processing.

Norris JE, McGeown WJ, Guerrini C, Castronovo J.

Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 15;6:999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00999. eCollection 2015.

11.

Numerosity processing is context driven even in the subitizing range: An fMRI study.

Leibovich T, Henik A, Salti M.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct;77:137-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.016. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

12.

Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement.

Halberda J, Mazzocco MM, Feigenson L.

Nature. 2008 Oct 2;455(7213):665-8. doi: 10.1038/nature07246. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

PMID:
18776888
13.

Is there really a link between exact-number knowledge and approximate number system acuity in young children?

Negen J, Sarnecka BW.

Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;33(1):92-105. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12071. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

14.

Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control.

Norris JE, Castronovo J.

PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155543. eCollection 2016.

15.

The role of numeracy and approximate number system acuity in predicting value and probability distortion.

Patalano AL, Saltiel JR, Machlin L, Barth H.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1820-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0849-9.

PMID:
26404634
16.

Individual differences in algebraic cognition: Relation to the approximate number and semantic memory systems.

Geary DC, Hoard MK, Nugent L, Rouder JN.

J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Dec;140:211-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.010. Epub 2015 Aug 7.

17.

Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.

DeWind NK, Adams GK, Platt ML, Brannon EM.

Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:247-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

18.

The contributions of numerical acuity and non-numerical stimulus features to the development of the number sense and symbolic math achievement.

Starr A, DeWind NK, Brannon EM.

Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:222-233. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

PMID:
28715669
19.

Differential processing of symbolic numerical magnitude and order in first-grade children.

Vogel SE, Remark A, Ansari D.

J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;129:26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

PMID:
25240153
20.

Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis.

Schneider M, Beeres K, Coban L, Merz S, Susan Schmidt S, Stricker J, De Smedt B.

Dev Sci. 2017 May;20(3). doi: 10.1111/desc.12372. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Review.

PMID:
26768176

Supplemental Content

Support Center