Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 199

1.

Curbing misconduct in the pharmaceutical industry: insights from behavioral ethics and the behavioral approach to law.

Feldman Y, Gauthier R, Schuler T.

J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Fall;41(3):620-8. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12071.

PMID:
24088152
2.

Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.

Sovacool BK.

Am J Bioeth. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):W1-7.

PMID:
16179287
3.

China cracks down on fake data in drug trials.

Cyranoski D.

Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7654):275. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.21977. No abstract available.

PMID:
28516939
4.

Scientific misconduct, the pharmaceutical industry, and the tragedy of institutions.

Cohen-Kohler JC, Esmail LC.

Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):431-46.

PMID:
17970244
6.

Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.

Okonta P, Rossouw T.

Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

7.

Research integrity: Sabotage!

Maher B.

Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):516-8. doi: 10.1038/467516a. No abstract available.

PMID:
20881988
8.

Keep it clean.

[No authors listed]

Nature. 2011 Aug 17;476(7360):251. doi: 10.1038/476251b. No abstract available.

PMID:
21850063
9.

Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.

Okonta PI, Rossouw T.

BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.

10.

Researcher is arrested for falsifying his results.

Dyer O.

BMJ. 2014 Jun 25;348:g4249. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4249. No abstract available.

PMID:
24965224
11.

The role of culture in research misconduct.

Davis MS.

Account Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;10(3):189-201.

PMID:
14979320
12.

Trial tests Austrian integrity body.

Abbott A.

Nature. 2012 May 1;485(7396):15. doi: 10.1038/485015a. No abstract available.

PMID:
22552066
13.

Research integrity and conflicts of interest: the case of unethical research-misconduct charges filed by Edward Calabrese.

Shrader-Frechette K.

Account Res. 2012;19(4):220-42. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.700882.

PMID:
22861179
14.

Understanding pharmaceutical research manipulation in the context of accounting manipulation.

Brown A.

J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Fall;41(3):611-9. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12070.

PMID:
24088151
15.

Assessing the preparedness of research integrity officers (RIOs) to appropriately handle possible research misconduct cases.

Bonito AJ, Titus SL, Wright DE.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):605-19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9274-2. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

PMID:
21647595
16.

Promoting research integrity in Africa: an African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward.

Kombe F, Anunobi EN, Tshifugula NP, Wassenaar D, Njadingwe D, Mwalukore S, Chinyama J, Randrianasolo B, Akindeh P, Dlamini PS, Ramiandrisoa FN, Ranaivo N.

Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Dec;14(3):158-66. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12024. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

17.

Misconduct mayhem.

Powell K.

Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):122-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16721916
18.

How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Fanelli D.

PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738. Review.

19.

Meyer: disagreements but no misconduct.

Vences M, Zardoya R.

Nature. 2004 Sep 30;431(7008):505. No abstract available.

PMID:
15457231
20.

Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.

Wada M.

Nature. 2014 Oct 2;514(7520):35. doi: 10.1038/514035a. No abstract available.

PMID:
25279908

Supplemental Content

Support Center