Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 366

1.

Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.

Biais M, Calderon J, Pernot M, Barandon L, Couffinhal T, Ouattara A, Sztark F.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1101-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

PMID:
24060469
2.

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.

Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2810-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b74e.

PMID:
18766099
3.

[Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].

Drvar Z, Pavlek M, Drvar V, Tomasević B, Baronica R, Perić M.

Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Dec;67(5):407-14. Croatian.

PMID:
24979881
4.

Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.

Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, Hanss R, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein B.

Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):650-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181959864.

PMID:
19114894
5.

The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.

Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):523-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182240054. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

PMID:
21642606
6.

Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G, Jabbour K.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):387-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

PMID:
22100211
7.

Dynamic and volumetric variables reliably predict fluid responsiveness in a porcine model with pleural effusion.

Broch O, Gruenewald M, Renner J, Meybohm P, Schöttler J, Heß K, Steinfath M, Bein B.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056267. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

8.

Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.

de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF.

Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):510-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958bf7.

PMID:
19114886
9.

Predicting fluid responsiveness with stroke volume variation despite multiple extrasystoles.

Cannesson M, Tran NP, Cho M, Hatib F, Michard F.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):193-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822ea119.

PMID:
21926593
10.

Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.

Freitas FG, Bafi AT, Nascente AP, Assunção M, Mazza B, Azevedo LC, Machado FR.

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):402-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes398. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

PMID:
23161359
11.

An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.

Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY; AzuRéa Group.

Anesthesiology. 2011 Sep;115(3):541-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500.

PMID:
21792056
12.

Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.

Geerts BF, Maas J, de Wilde RB, Aarts LP, Jansen JR.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):802-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834a67d2.

PMID:
21799416
13.

Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.

Biais M, Cottenceau V, Stecken L, Jean M, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Sztark F.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc632.

PMID:
22425817
14.

Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Lee JH, Jeon Y, Bahk JH, Gil NS, Kim KB, Hong DM, Kim HJ.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1056-62. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

PMID:
21924634
15.

Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.

Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Hedderich J, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein B.

Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Dec;18(12):1170-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02770.x.

PMID:
19076570
16.

Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach.

Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, Pottecher J, Lakhal K, Benzekri-Lefevre D, Molinari N, Boulain T, Lefrant JY, Muller L; AzuRea Group.

Crit Care. 2014 Nov 4;18(6):587. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9.

17.

Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review.

Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR, Ansermino JM.

Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1380-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a9557e. Review.

PMID:
24257389
18.

Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.

Vistisen ST, Koefoed-Nielsen J, Larsson A.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Feb;54(2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02061.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13.

PMID:
19681786
19.

Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.

Trepte CJ, Eichhorn V, Haas SA, Stahl K, Schmid F, Nitzschke R, Goetz AE, Reuter DA.

Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):736-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet204. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23811425
20.

The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.

Desebbe O, Boucau C, Farhat F, Bastien O, Lehot JJ, Cannesson M.

Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):792-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cd6d06.

PMID:
20185658

Supplemental Content

Support Center