Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Turner L, Boutron I, Hróbjartsson A, Altman DG, Moher D.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:79. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-79. Review. No abstract available.

2.

Studying systematic reviews.

Del Mar C, Glasziou P.

J Fam Pract. 2001 Nov;50(11):955-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
11711011
3.

Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods.

Chandler J, Hopewell S.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2:76. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-76.

4.
5.

From the five blind men to Cochrane Complementary Medicine systematic reviews.

Ezzo J.

J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Dec;9(6):969-72. No abstract available.

PMID:
14736367
6.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
7.

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews.

Mayhew AD, Kabir M, Ansari MT.

Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;4:136. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0122-3.

8.

Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.

Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Takwoingi Y, Macaskill P.

Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 7;2:82. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-82. Review.

9.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

10.

The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Mistiaen P, Poot E, Hickox S, Wagner C.

Nurse Res. 2004;12(2):71-80.

PMID:
15636007
11.

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.

Lundh A, Gøtzsche PC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 21;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-22.

12.

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.017. Review.

PMID:
18394534
13.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L.

J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. Review.

14.

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.

Mueller KF, Meerpohl JJ, Briel M, Antes G, von Elm E, Lang B, Gloy V, Motschall E, Schwarzer G, Bassler D.

Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 25;2:60. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-60.

15.

Systematic review hacks for the sports and exercise clinician: five essential methodological elements.

Ardern CL.

Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(8):447-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095548. Epub 2015 Nov 26. No abstract available.

PMID:
26612842
16.

The truth about EBP and RCTs.

Stevens KR.

J Nurs Adm. 2002 May;32(5):232-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
12021563
17.

What is a Cochrane review?

Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Barbui C.

Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Sep;20(3):231-3. Review.

PMID:
21922964
18.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.

Windsor B, Popovich I, Jordan V, Showell M, Shea B, Farquhar C.

Hum Reprod. 2012 Dec;27(12):3460-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des342. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23034152
19.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.

Remschmidt C, Wichmann O, Harder T.

Vaccine. 2014 Mar 26;32(15):1678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.060. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24513008
20.

Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.

Burton M, Clarke M.

Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;86(1):101-14, ix. Review.

PMID:
16442423

Supplemental Content

Support Center