Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Band-like interposing fat along large vessels: ultrasonographic pseudolesions of the breast.

Kang BJ, Kim HS, Cha ES, Lee JH, Park CS, Jung NY, Whang IY, Kim SH, Choi JJ, Lee A.

Korean J Radiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):711-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.711. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

2.

Ultrasonographic hyperechoic lesions of the breast: are they always benign?

Nam SY, Ko ES, Han BK, Shin S, Ko EY, Shin JH, Hahn SY.

Acta Radiol. 2015 Jan;56(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/0284185113512482. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

PMID:
24252817
3.

Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.

Elverici E, Barça AN, Aktaş H, Özsoy A, Zengin B, Çavuşoğlu M, Araz L.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):189-94. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14103.

4.

BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS.

Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91. Epub 2006 Mar 28.

PMID:
16569780
5.

Ultrasonographic findings 6 months after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy.

Docktor BJ, MacGregor JH, Burrowes PW.

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004 Jun;55(3):151-6.

PMID:
15237775
6.

Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

Park YM, Park JS, Jung HS, Yoon HK, Yang WT.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2013 May;41(4):218-23. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22036. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

PMID:
23325754
7.

Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.

Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E.

Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):665-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523080670. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

PMID:
19567644
8.

Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?

Tozaki M, Fukuma E.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Sep 1;52(7):706-10. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110039. Epub 2011 May 19.

PMID:
21596798
9.

Breast ultrasonographic and histopathological characteristics without any mammographic abnormalities.

Tamaki K, Ishida T, Miyashita M, Amari M, Ohuchi N, Kamada Y, Uehara K, Tamaki N, Sasano H.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar;42(3):168-74. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr197. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

PMID:
22217577
10.

Sclerosing adenosis: mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with clinical and histopathological correlation.

Günhan-Bilgen I, Memiş A, Ustün EE, Ozdemir N, Erhan Y.

Eur J Radiol. 2002 Dec;44(3):232-8.

PMID:
12468074
11.

Radiologic findings of lobular carcinoma in situ: mammography and ultrasonography.

Choi BB, Kim SH, Park CS, Cha ES, Lee AW.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2011 Feb;39(2):59-63. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20772. Epub 2010 Dec 7.

PMID:
21213330
12.

Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features.

Günhan-Bilgen I, Bozkaya H, Ustün E, Memiş A.

Eur J Radiol. 2002 Sep;43(3):246-55.

PMID:
12204407
13.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by ultrasonographically guided core needle biopsy.

Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, Yu CP, Chang WC, Tung HJ, Lin WC, Tsai SH, Huang GS.

Ultraschall Med. 2012 Oct;33(5):447-54. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

PMID:
22161618
14.

Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography.

Taskin F, Koseoglu K, Ozbas S, Erkus M, Karaman C.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 Jun;40(5):261-5. doi: 10.1002/jcu.21923. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

PMID:
22508447
15.

Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.

Heinig J, Witteler R, Schmitz R, Kiesel L, Steinhard J.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;32(4):573-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.5191.

16.

Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast.

Bode MK, Rissanen T.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Mar 1;52(2):128-33. doi: 10.1258/ar.2010.100239.

PMID:
21498339
17.

Ultrasonographic features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.

Lee JH, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Lee AW, Song BJ.

Korean J Radiol. 2010 Sep-Oct;11(5):522-7. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.5.522. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

18.

Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, Schäfer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Mendelson EB, Balu-Maestro C, Locatelli M, Tourasse C, Cavanaugh BC, Juhan V, Stavros AT, Tardivon A, Gay J, Henry JP, Cohen-Bacrie C; BE1 Investigators..

Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):435-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110640.

PMID:
22282182
19.

Radial scar-significant diagnostic challenge.

Egyed Z, Péntek Z, Járay B, Kulka J, Svastics E, Kas J, László Z.

Pathol Oncol Res. 2008 Jun;14(2):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9025-0. Epub 2008 Apr 12.

PMID:
18409019
20.

Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.

Patterson SK, Helvie MA, Aziz K, Nees AV.

Breast J. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5):418-23.

Supplemental Content

Support Center