Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 53

1.

Gemstone spectral imaging: determination of CT to ED conversion curves for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Yagi M, Ueguchi T, Koizumi M, Ogata T, Yamada S, Takahashi Y, Sumida I, Akino Y, Konishi K, Isohashi F, Tomiyama N, Yoshioka Y, Ogawa K.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 Sep 6;14(5):173-86. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i5.4335.

PMID:
24036870
2.

Feasibility and accuracy of relative electron density determined by virtual monochromatic CT value subtraction at two different energies using the gemstone spectral imaging.

Ogata T, Ueguchi T, Yagi M, Yamada S, Tanaka C, Ogihara R, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Tomiyama N, Ogawa K, Koizumi M.

Radiat Oncol. 2013 Apr 9;8:83. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-83.

3.
4.

Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.

Verellen D, Vinh-Hung V, Bijdekerke P, Nijs F, Linthout N, Bel A, Storme G.

Radiother Oncol. 1999 Mar;50(3):355-66.

PMID:
10392823
5.
6.

Correlation between CT attenuation value and iodine concentration in vitro: discrepancy between gemstone spectral imaging on single-source dual-energy CT and traditional polychromatic X-ray imaging.

Wang L, Liu B, Wu XW, Wang J, Zhou Y, Wang WQ, Zhu XH, Yu YQ, Li XH, Zhang S, Shen Y.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Aug;56(4):379-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02379.x. Epub 2012 May 23.

PMID:
22883644
7.
8.
9.

Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies.

Wei J, Sandison GA, Hsi WC, Ringor M, Lu X.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 Oct 21;51(20):5183-97. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

PMID:
17019032
10.
11.

Verification of CT number to density conversion for a simulator-T attachment.

Chapman A, Butson M, Quach K, Rozenfeld A, Metcalfe P.

Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2002 Jul;25(2):78-80.

PMID:
12219848
12.
13.

The application of metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT scans for radiation oncology by monoenergetic extrapolation with a DECT scanner.

Schwahofer A, Bär E, Kuchenbecker S, Grossmann JG, Kachelrieß M, Sterzing F.

Z Med Phys. 2015 Dec;25(4):314-25. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

PMID:
26144602
15.

Electron density measurement with dual-energy x-ray CT using synchrotron radiation.

Torikoshi M, Tsunoo T, Sasaki M, Endo M, Noda Y, Ohno Y, Kohno T, Hyodo K, Uesugi K, Yagi N.

Phys Med Biol. 2003 Mar 7;48(5):673-85.

PMID:
12696802
16.

Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.

Hatton J, McCurdy B, Greer PB.

Phys Med Biol. 2009 Aug 7;54(15):N329-46. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/N01. Epub 2009 Jul 10.

PMID:
19590116
17.

Assessment of target volume doses in radiotherapy based on the standard and measured calibration curves.

Mohammadi GF, Alam NR, Rezaeejam H, Pourfallah TA, Zakariaee SS.

J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;11(3):586-91. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.163696.

18.

The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.

Langen KM, Meeks SL, Poole DO, Wagner TH, Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Ruchala KJ, Haimerl J, Olivera GH.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 21;50(18):4259-76. Epub 2005 Aug 31.

PMID:
16148392
20.

Radiotherapy treatment planning with contrast-enhanced computed tomography: feasibility of dual-energy virtual unenhanced imaging for improved dose calculations.

Yamada S, Ueguchi T, Ogata T, Mizuno H, Ogihara R, Koizumi M, Shimazu T, Murase K, Ogawa K.

Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul 29;9:168. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-168.

Supplemental Content

Support Center