Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 66

1.

Evaluation of a patient specific femoral alignment guide for hip resurfacing.

Olsen M, Naudie DD, Edwards MR, Sellan ME, McCalden RW, Schemitsch EH.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

PMID:
24034907
2.

A comparison of conventional guidewire alignment jigs with imageless computer navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Olsen M, Chiu M, Gamble P, Boyle RA, Tumia N, Schemitsch EH.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1834-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00648.

PMID:
20686057
3.

The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.

Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, Waddell JP, Schemitsch E.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Apr;89(4):557-60.

4.

A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study.

Audenaert E, De Smedt K, Gelaude F, Clijmans T, Pattyn C, Geebelen B.

Comput Aided Surg. 2011;16(6):304-9. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2011.613951. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

PMID:
21916560
5.

Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.

Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, Zadow S, Oakeshott R.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):917-22. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0584-x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

6.

Computer navigated hip resurfacing for patients with abnormal femoral anatomy.

Olsen M, Schemitsch EH.

Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):159-63.

7.

Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.

Kitada M, Sakai T, Murase T, Hanada T, Nakamura N, Sugano N.

Int J Med Robot. 2013 Jun;9(2):223-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1490. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

PMID:
23460526
8.

Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Olsen M, Davis ET, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):310-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21288.

PMID:
19258604
9.

[Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study].

Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, Müller-Rath R, Radermacher K, Wirtz D, Mumme T.

Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 May-Jun;146(3):357-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038464. German.

PMID:
18561082
10.

Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Günther KP.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1341-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0299-z. Epub 2008 May 17.

11.

Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Pitto RP, Malak S, Anderson IA.

Int Orthop. 2009 Apr;33(2):391-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0644-6. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

12.

Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.

Morison Z, Mehra A, Olsen M, Donnelly M, Schemitsch E.

Indian J Orthop. 2013 Nov;47(6):585-90. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.121585.

13.

A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement arthroplasty: description and first results.

Raaijmaakers M, Gelaude F, De Smedt K, Clijmans T, Dille J, Mulier M.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 14;11:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-161.

14.

Evaluation of a new fluoroscopy-based navigation system in the placement of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.

Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, Radermacher K, Mumme T.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(4):565-76.

PMID:
20476504
15.

Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Salvi AE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1639-40; author reply 1641-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0793-y. Epub 2009 Mar 21. No abstract available.

16.

Comparison of bone removed during total hip arthroplasty with a resurfacing or conventional femoral component: a cadaveric study.

Su EP, Sheehan M, Su SL.

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

PMID:
19056234
17.

[Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].

Gravius S, Belei P, de la Fuente M, Müller-Rath R, Radermacher K, Christian Wirtz D, Mumme T.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008 Aug;53(4):204-12. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2008.026. German.

PMID:
18643714
18.

The influence of computer navigation on trainee learning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Saithna A, Dekker AP.

Comput Aided Surg. 2009;14(4-6):117-22. doi: 10.3109/10929080903444440. Review.

PMID:
20121591
19.

The effect of the cam deformity on the insertion of the femoral component in hip resurfacing.

Antoniou J, Bergeron SG, Ma B, Chakravertty R, Rudan J.

J Arthroplasty. 2011 Apr;26(3):458-66. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.100. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

PMID:
20347252
20.

[Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].

Michaut M, Beaufils P, Galaud B, Abadie P, Boisrenoult P, Fallet L.

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Oct;94(6):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.03.038. Epub 2008 May 27. French.

PMID:
18929753

Supplemental Content

Support Center