Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 243

1.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles.

Gateno J, Cookston C, Hsu SS, Stal DN, Durrani SK, Gold J, Ismaily S, Alexander JW, Noble PC, Xia JJ.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1900-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.218. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

PMID:
24012175
2.

Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.

Vajgel A, Camargo IB, Willmersdorf RB, de Melo TM, Laureano Filho JR, Vasconcellos RJ.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.09.019.

PMID:
23351762
3.

A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.

Madsen MJ, McDaniel CA, Haug RH.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):2012-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.013.

PMID:
18848096
4.

Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.

Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Nov;60(11):1319-26.

PMID:
12420268
5.

The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors.

Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, Sándor GK, Avery CM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):855-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

PMID:
24467871
6.

Biomechanical testing of different osteosynthesis systems for segmental resection of the mandible.

Schupp W, Arzdorf M, Linke B, Gutwald R.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):924-30.

PMID:
17448842
7.

Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.

Grohmann I, Raith S, Kesting M, Rau A, Mücke T, Lethaus B, Hölzle F, Steiner T.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):942-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

PMID:
23958348
8.

Adaquate fixation of plates for stability during mandibular reconstruction.

Kimura A, Nagasao T, Kaneko T, Tamaki T, Miyamoto J, Nakajima T.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;34(4):193-200. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

PMID:
16624567
9.

Biomechanical evaluation of different angle-stable locking plate systems for mandibular surgery.

Lieger O, Schaller B, Bürki A, Büchler P.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;43(8):1589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

PMID:
26297419
10.

Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects.

Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;34(4):201-9. Epub 2006 Apr 27.

PMID:
16644232
11.

An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.

Van Sickels JE, Peterson GP, Holms S, Haug RH.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1620-5.

PMID:
16243179
12.

In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

PMID:
19962812
13.

Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.

O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA Jr.

J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb.

PMID:
18978547
14.

Biomechanical effects of screw fixation in second mandibular reconstruction plate.

Chang YW, Liu PH.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:3167-70. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610213.

PMID:
24110400
15.

A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.

Haug RH, Fattahi TT, Goltz M.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;59(10):1199-210.

PMID:
11573182
16.

An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.

Brasileiro BF, Grempel RG, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.

PMID:
19304039
17.

A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.

Nagasao T, Miyamoto J, Tamaki T, Kawana H.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):346-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.009. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

PMID:
20097102
18.

An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.

Brasileiro BF, Grotta-Grempel R, Ambrosano GM, Passeri LA.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.106. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

PMID:
21752510
19.

A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.

Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):452-6.

PMID:
16487808
20.

A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.

Peterson GP, Haug RH, Van Sickels J.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9):1317-24.

PMID:
16122596

Supplemental Content

Support Center