Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Development of a novel breast MRI phantom for quality control.

Tuong B, Gardiner I.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):W511-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9571.

PMID:
23971483
2.

MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.

Mirowitz SA, Apicella P, Reinus WR, Hammerman AM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):215-21.

PMID:
8273669
3.

MR breast imaging: a comparative analysis of conventional and parallel imaging acquisition.

Orlacchio A, Bolacchi F, Rotili A, Cossu E, Tanga I, Cozzolino V, Simonetti G.

Radiol Med. 2008 Jun;113(4):465-76. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0278-1. Epub 2008 Jun 3. English, Italian.

PMID:
18523845
4.
5.

Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.

Cha JG, Jin W, Lee MH, Kim DH, Park JS, Shin WH, Yi BH.

Radiology. 2011 Jun;259(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101856. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

PMID:
21386053
6.

Comparing T1-weighted and T2-weighted three-point Dixon technique with conventional T1-weighted fat-saturation and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) techniques for the study of the lumbar spine in a short-bore MRI machine.

Brandão S, Seixas D, Ayres-Basto M, Castro S, Neto J, Martins C, Ferreira JC, Parada F.

Clin Radiol. 2013 Nov;68(11):e617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

PMID:
23932678
7.

Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.

Dubin MD, Teresi LM, Bradley WG Jr, Jordan JE, Pema PJ, Goergen SK, Tam JK.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1213-21.

PMID:
7717234
8.

Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI?

Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, Gieseke J, Wardelmann E, Schild HH.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Feb;9(2):187-96.

PMID:
10077012
9.

MRI of fat necrosis of the breast: the "black hole" sign at short tau inversion recovery.

Trimboli RM, Carbonaro LA, Cartia F, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Apr;81(4):e573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.048. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

PMID:
21742453
10.

3-T MRI of rectal carcinoma: preoperative diagnosis, staging, and planning of sphincter-sparing surgery.

Zhang XM, Zhang HL, Yu D, Dai Y, Bi D, Prince MR, Li C.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1271-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2505.

PMID:
18430843
11.

MRI and PET/CT of patients with bone metastases from breast carcinoma.

Grankvist J, Fisker R, Iyer V, Fründ ET, Simonsen C, Christensen T, Stenbygaard L, Ewertz M, Larsson EM.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):e13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.024. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

PMID:
21227614
12.
13.

The role of STIR MRI sequence in the evaluation of the breast following conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Forrai G, Polgar C, Zana K, Riedl E, Fodor J, Nemeth G, Fornet B.

Neoplasma. 2001;48(1):7-11.

PMID:
11327541
14.

Usefulness of simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics technique for MRI of the knee.

Magee T, Shapiro M, Williams D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jun;182(6):1411-5.

PMID:
15149984
15.

MRI of soft-tissue tumors: fast STIR sequence as substitute for T1-weighted fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced spin-echo sequence.

Tokuda O, Harada Y, Matsunaga N.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1607-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2675.

PMID:
19933655
16.

Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.

Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimmig R, Reiser MF.

Radiology. 1998 Jan;206(1):125-9.

PMID:
9423661
18.

Poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel phantoms for use in ultrasound and MR imaging.

Surry KJ, Austin HJ, Fenster A, Peters TM.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 Dec 21;49(24):5529-46.

PMID:
15724540
19.

Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI.

Ma J, Vu AT, Son JB, Choi H, Hazle JD.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jan;23(1):36-41.

PMID:
16315212
20.

Fat-water interface on susceptibility-weighted imaging and gradient-echo imaging: comparison of phantoms to intracranial lipomas.

Mehemed TM, Yamamoto A, Okada T, Kanagaki M, Fushimi Y, Sawada T, Togashi K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct;201(4):902-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10049.

PMID:
24059382

Supplemental Content

Support Center