Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 547

1.

Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Reznicek L, Muth D, Kampik A, Neubauer AS, Hirneiss C.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;97(11):1410-4. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303400. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

PMID:
23969314
2.

Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P.

J Glaucoma. 2015 Oct-Nov;24(8):568-74. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000133.

PMID:
25318572
3.

Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;92(1):e66-73. doi: 10.1111/aos.12209. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

5.

The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.

Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.058. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

PMID:
22035576
6.

[Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].

Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Mar;30(3):260-70. French.

7.

Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.

Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):840-849.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.032. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

PMID:
22310080
8.

A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.

Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, Deng SX, Cui X, Yu X, Sun X.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 23;54(1):659-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10984.

PMID:
23307970
9.

[Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].

Steinberg J, Mehlan J, Frings A, Druchkiv V, Richard G, Katz T, Linke SJ.

Ophthalmologe. 2015 Sep;112(9):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3188-8. German.

PMID:
25501931
10.

Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.

Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5337-47.

PMID:
17122122
11.

[Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].

Coste V, Schweitzer C, Paya C, Touboul D, Korobelnik JF.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Jun;38(6):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 May 11. French.

12.

The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;89(12):1572-5.

13.

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.

Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25.

PMID:
18219335
14.

Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.

Smedowski A, Weglarz B, Tarnawska D, Kaarniranta K, Wylegala E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Feb 4;55(2):666-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13172.

PMID:
24425850
15.

Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P.

Eye (Lond). 2011 May;25(5):642-50. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.60. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

16.

Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, Lesk MR.

J Glaucoma. 2011 Oct;20(8):482-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbe8f.

PMID:
21048515
17.

Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.

Tian L, Wang D, Wu Y, Meng X, Chen B, Ge M, Huang Y.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;94(5):e317-24. doi: 10.1111/aos.12672. Epub 2015 Feb 1.

18.

Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness.

Fujioka M, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A.

Curr Eye Res. 2007 Feb;32(2):89-94.

PMID:
17364741
19.

Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.

Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.

Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

PMID:
20122737
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center