Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.

Wang H, Liao X, Ma X, Li C, Han J, Zhou Y.

Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jul;47(4):352-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.114915.

2.

Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG.

Anderson DG, Wierzbowski LR, Schwartz DM, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1577-81.

PMID:
12131721
3.

Stimulus-evoked electromyography testing of percutaneous pedicle screws for the detection of pedicle breaches: a clinical study of 409 screws in 93 patients.

Wang MY, Pineiro G, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Nov;13(5):600-5. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09536.

PMID:
21039151
4.

The use of evoked EMG in detecting misplaced thoracolumbar pedicle screws.

Danesh-Clough T, Taylor P, Hodgson B, Walton M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 15;26(12):1313-6.

PMID:
11426144
5.

Evaluation of the intrinsic properties of pedicle screws: do diameter, manufacturing and screw design affect resistance and/or resistivity.

Limthongkul W, Savage J, Nenonene EK, Karaikovic EE.

Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 Oct;9 Suppl 1:77-82.

PMID:
19912122
6.

Recording diffusion responses from contralateral intercostal muscles after stimulus-triggered electromyography: refining a tool for the assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement in an experimental porcine model.

de Blas G, Burgos J, Regidor I, Barrios C, Solá R, García-Urquiza S, Hevia E.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):E391-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a273a6.

PMID:
19444052
7.

Safe pedicle screw placement in thoracic scoliotic curves using t-EMG: stimulation threshold variability at concavity and convexity in apex segments.

de Blas G, Barrios C, Regidor I, Montes E, Burgos J, Pizá-Vallespir G, Hevia E.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 15;37(6):E387-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b077b.

PMID:
22024903
8.

Can triggered electromyography be used to evaluate pedicle screw placement in hydroxyapatite-coated screws: an electrical examination.

Davis TT, Tadlock S, Bernbeck J, Fung DA, Molinares DM.

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr;31(2):138-42. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000040.

PMID:
24691231
9.

Pulse-train stimulation for detecting medial malpositioning of thoracic pedicle screws.

Donohue ML, Murtagh-Schaffer C, Basta J, Moquin RR, Bashir A, Calancie B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):E378-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343c1.

PMID:
18496333
10.

Neuromonitoring with pulse-train stimulation for implantation of thoracic pedicle screws: a blinded and randomized clinical study. Part 2. The role of feedback.

Calancie B, Donohue ML, Moquin RR.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):692-704. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13649. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

PMID:
24684176
11.

Electrical stimulation for intraoperative evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Shi YB, Binette M, Martin WH, Pearson JM, Hart RA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):595-601.

PMID:
12642768
12.

Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring to optimize safe lumbar pedicle screw placement - a retrospective analysis.

Kaliya-Perumal AK, Charng JR, Niu CC, Tsai TT, Lai PL, Chen LH, Chen WJ.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 May 30;18(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1594-1.

13.

Neuromonitoring with pulse-train stimulation for implantation of thoracic pedicle screws: a blinded and randomized clinical study. Part 1. Methods and alarm criteria.

Calancie B, Donohue ML, Harris CB, Canute GW, Singla A, Wilcoxen KG, Moquin RR.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):675-91. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13648. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

PMID:
24684171
14.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring: can the results of direct stimulation of titanium-alloy pedicle screws in the thoracic spine be trusted?

Donohue ML, Swaminathan V, Gilbert JL, Fox CW, Smale J, Moquin RR, Calancie B.

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;29(6):502-8. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182767aac.

PMID:
23207589
15.

Electromyographic thresholds after thoracic screw stimulation depend on the distance of the screw from the spinal cord and not on pedicle cortex integrity.

Montes E, De Blas G, Regidor I, Barrios C, Burgos J, Hevia E, Palanca JM, Correa C.

Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

PMID:
21996524
16.

Stimulus-evoked EMG monitoring during transpedicular lumbosacral spine instrumentation. Initial clinical results.

Calancie B, Madsen P, Lebwohl N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Dec 15;19(24):2780-6.

PMID:
7899979
17.

Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Accuracy with Dynamic Electromyography: The Early Experience of a Traditionally Open Spine Surgeon.

Malham GM, Goss B, Blecher C.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;76(4):303-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1373664. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

PMID:
25915498
18.

Ability of electromyographic monitoring to determine the presence of malpositioned pedicle screws in the lumbosacral spine: analysis of 2450 consecutively placed screws.

Parker SL, Amin AG, Farber SH, McGirt MJ, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Aug;15(2):130-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE101.

PMID:
21529126
19.

Improving accuracy and reducing radiation exposure in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.

Wood MJ, Mannion RJ.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 May;12(5):533-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.11.SPINE09270.

PMID:
20433301
20.

Current trends in pedicle screw stimulation techniques: lumbosacral, thoracic, and cervical levels.

Isley MR, Zhang XF, Balzer JR, Leppanen RE.

Neurodiagn J. 2012 Jun;52(2):100-75. Review.

PMID:
22808751

Supplemental Content

Support Center