Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Electronic health records: new opportunities for clinical research.

Coorevits P, Sundgren M, Klein GO, Bahr A, Claerhout B, Daniel C, Dugas M, Dupont D, Schmidt A, Singleton P, De Moor G, Kalra D.

J Intern Med. 2013 Dec;274(6):547-60. doi: 10.1111/joim.12119. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Review.

2.

Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project.

De Moor G, Sundgren M, Kalra D, Schmidt A, Dugas M, Claerhout B, Karakoyun T, Ohmann C, Lastic PY, Ammour N, Kush R, Dupont D, Cuggia M, Daniel C, Thienpont G, Coorevits P.

J Biomed Inform. 2015 Feb;53:162-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

3.

Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P.

Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
17951106
4.

Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: from the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform.

El Fadly A, Rance B, Lucas N, Mead C, Chatellier G, Lastic PY, Jaulent MC, Daniel C.

J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44 Suppl 1:S94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

5.

Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility.

Marcos M, Maldonado JA, Martínez-Salvador B, Boscá D, Robles M.

J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):676-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 22.

6.

ResearchEHR: use of semantic web technologies and archetypes for the description of EHRs.

Robles M, Fernández-Breis JT, Maldonado JA, Moner D, Martínez-Costa C, Bosca D, Menárguez-Tortosa M.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;155:129-35.

PMID:
20543320
7.

Cost-benefit assessment of using electronic health records data for clinical research versus current practices: Contribution of the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) European Project.

Beresniak A, Schmidt A, Proeve J, Bolanos E, Patel N, Ammour N, Sundgren M, Ericson M, Karakoyun T, Coorevits P, Kalra D, De Moor G, Dupont D.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jan;46:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

PMID:
26600286
8.

[Value of hospital electronic health records for clinical research: contribution of the European project EHR4CR].

Dupont D, Beresniak A, Kalra D, Coorevits P, De Moor G.

Med Sci (Paris). 2018 Nov;34(11):972-977. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2018235. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Review. French.

PMID:
30526834
9.

Common data elements for secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical trial execution and serious adverse event reporting.

Bruland P, McGilchrist M, Zapletal E, Acosta D, Proeve J, Askin S, Ganslandt T, Doods J, Dugas M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):159.

10.

Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.

Cifuentes M, Davis M, Fernald D, Gunn R, Dickinson P, Cohen DJ.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1:S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.

11.

Electronic health record interoperability as realized in the Turkish health information system.

Dogac A, Yuksel M, Avci A, Ceyhan B, Hülür U, Eryilmaz Z, Mollahaliloglu S, Atbakan E, Akdag R.

Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(2):140-9. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0022. Epub 2010 Dec 6.

PMID:
21132219
12.

Development of an open metadata schema for prospective clinical research (openPCR) in China.

Xu W, Guan Z, Sun J, Wang Z, Geng Y.

Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(1):39-46. doi: 10.3414/ME13-01-0008. Epub 2013 Dec 9.

PMID:
24317371
13.

A federated semantic metadata registry framework for enabling interoperability across clinical research and care domains.

Sinaci AA, Laleci Erturkmen GB.

J Biomed Inform. 2013 Oct;46(5):784-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

14.
15.

The REUSE project: EHR as single datasource for biomedical research.

El Fadly A, Lucas N, Rance B, Verplancke P, Lastic PY, Daniel C.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):1324-8.

PMID:
20841899
16.

Envisioning a learning health care system: the electronic primary care research network, a case study.

Delaney BC, Peterson KA, Speedie S, Taweel A, Arvanitis TN, Hobbs FD.

Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):54-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1313.

17.

Archetype-based data warehouse environment to enable the reuse of electronic health record data.

Marco-Ruiz L, Moner D, Maldonado JA, Kolstrup N, Bellika JG.

Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep;84(9):702-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

PMID:
26094821
18.

Electronic Health Records Data and Metadata: Challenges for Big Data in the United States.

Sweet LE, Moulaison HL.

Big Data. 2013 Dec;1(4):245-51. doi: 10.1089/big.2013.0023. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

PMID:
27447257
19.

Piloting the EHR4CR feasibility platform across Europe.

Doods J, Bache R, McGilchrist M, Daniel C, Dugas M, Fritz F; Work Package 7.

Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(4):264-8. doi: 10.3414/ME13-01-0134. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

PMID:
24954881
20.

Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data: the SHARPn project.

Rea S, Pathak J, Savova G, Oniki TA, Westberg L, Beebe CE, Tao C, Parker CG, Haug PJ, Huff SM, Chute CG.

J Biomed Inform. 2012 Aug;45(4):763-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

Supplemental Content

Support Center