Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

A comparison of the performance of the I-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chen X, Jiao J, Cong X, Liu L, Wu X.

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e71910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071910. eCollection 2013.

2.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Damodaran S, Sethi S, Malhotra SK, Samra T, Maitra S, Saini V.

Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):390-395. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_149_17.

3.

Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bhattacharjee S, Som A, Maitra S.

J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep;41:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

PMID:
28802606
4.

Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.

Gupta S, Dogra N, Chauhan K.

Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):647-650. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_238_16.

5.

Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Park SK, Choi GJ, Choi YS, Ahn EJ, Kang H.

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0119469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119469. eCollection 2015. Review.

6.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Shin HW, Yoo HN, Bae GE, Chang JC, Park MK, You HS, Kim HJ, Ahn HS.

J Int Med Res. 2016 Jun;44(3):405-18. doi: 10.1177/0300060515607386. Epub 2016 Mar 23. Review.

7.

Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.

Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, Eich C, Bräuer A, Crozier TA, Bauer M, Strack M.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug 7;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-12-18.

8.

A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.

Kim H, Lee JY, Lee SY, Park SY, Lee SC, Chung CJ.

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov;67(5):317-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.317. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

9.

Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients.

Reza Hashemian SM, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, Zaker E, Jafari A, Eftekhari P, Radmand G, Mohajerani SA, Radpay B.

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec;4(4):288-92. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.147520.

10.

LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™--a comparison of insertion success in novices.

Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, Alvisi R, Volta CA.

Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):384-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07002.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

11.

Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.

Kleine-Brueggeney M, Gottfried A, Nabecker S, Greif R, Book M, Theiler L.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0403-6.

12.

Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.

Joly N, Poulin LP, Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F, St-Pierre P.

Can J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;61(9):794-800. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0198-6. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

PMID:
25141831
13.

Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers.

Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, Quintel M, Mohr A.

Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):996-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes314. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

PMID:
23015619
15.

Early versus late removal of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for general anaesthesia.

Mathew PJ, Mathew JL.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 10;(8):CD007082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007082.pub2. Review.

PMID:
26258959
16.
17.

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 May;31(5):266-73. doi: 10.1097/01.EJA.0000435015.89651.3d. Review.

PMID:
24145803
18.

Comparative efficacy and safety of the Ambu(®) AuraOnce(™) laryngeal mask airway during general anaesthesia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Baidya DK, Chandralekha, Darlong V, Pandey R, Maitra S, Khanna P.

Anaesthesia. 2014 Sep;69(9):1023-32. doi: 10.1111/anae.12682. Epub 2014 May 7. Review.

19.

Tracheal intubation through the I-gel™ supraglottic airway versus the LMA Fastrach™: a randomized controlled trial.

Halwagi AE, Massicotte N, Lallo A, Gauthier A, Boudreault D, Ruel M, Girard F.

Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):152-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318236f438. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

PMID:
22075016
20.

Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial.

Zaballos M, Bastida E, Agustí S, Portas M, Jiménez C, López-Gil M.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 6;15:131. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0115-8.

Supplemental Content

Support Center