Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 64

1.

A new deconvolution approach to robust fluence for intensity modulation under geometrical uncertainty.

Zhang P, De Crevoisier R, Simon A, Haigron P, Coatrieux JL, Li B, Shu H.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 7;58(17):6095-110. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/6095. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

2.

Intensity modulation under geometrical uncertainty: a deconvolution approach to robust fluence.

Fan Y, Nath R.

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 21;55(14):4029-45. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/006. Epub 2010 Jul 5.

PMID:
20601776
3.

Modulation index for VMAT considering both mechanical and dose calculation uncertainties.

Park JM, Park SY, Kim H.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Sep 21;60(18):7101-25. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7101. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

PMID:
26317697
4.

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity.

Rudat V, Nour A, Hammoud M, Alaradi A, Mohammed A.

Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Feb;192(2):109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0919-y. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

5.

Radiation-induced second primary cancer risks from modern external beam radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: impact of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy.

Murray LJ, Thompson CM, Lilley J, Cosgrove V, Franks K, Sebag-Montefiore D, Henry AM.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 7;60(3):1237-57. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1237. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

PMID:
25590229
6.

Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization.

van de Water S, Kooy HM, Heijmen BJ, Hoogeman MS.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

7.

Reducing the number of segments in unidirectional MLC segmentations.

Mellado X, Cruz S, Artacho JM, Canellas M.

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 7;55(3):N75-85. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/N01. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

PMID:
20057009
8.

Toward a web-based real-time radiation treatment planning system in a cloud computing environment.

Na YH, Suh TS, Kapp DS, Xing L.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 21;58(18):6525-40. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/18/6525. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

PMID:
24002571
9.

Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning.

Bohoslavsky R, Witte MG, Janssen TM, van Herk M.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jun 7;58(11):3563-80. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/3563. Epub 2013 May 2.

PMID:
23640114
10.

Improvement in clinical step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery accuracy on an integrated linear accelerator control system.

Agnew CE, Irvine DM, Hounsell AR, McGarry CK.

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan-Feb;4(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

PMID:
24621422
11.

Sinogram analysis of aperture optimization by iterative least-squares in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Bedford JL.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Mar 7;58(5):1235-50. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/5/1235. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

PMID:
23380767
12.

Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments.

Zhu L, Lee L, Ma Y, Ye Y, Mazzeo R, Xing L.

Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;53(23):6653-72. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/002. Epub 2008 Nov 7.

PMID:
18997262
13.

Arc-modulated radiation therapy based on linear models.

Zhu X, Thongphiew D, McMahon R, Li T, Chankong V, Yin FF, Wu QJ.

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 7;55(13):3873-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/020.

PMID:
20571210
14.

A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Shah AP, Chen SS, Strauss JB, Kirk MC, Coleman JL, Coon AB, Miller C, Dickler A.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct;32(5):460-6. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181967d89.

PMID:
19564784
15.

Inverse planning optimization method for intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Lan Y, Ren H, Li C, Min Z, Wan J, Ma J, Hung CC.

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct;12(5):391-401. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500339. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

PMID:
23617286
16.

Uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy.

Suzuki J, Tateoka K, Shima K, Yaegashi Y, Fujimoto K, Saitoh Y, Nakata A, Abe T, Nakazawa T, Sakata K, Hareyama M.

J Radiat Res. 2012 Jul;53(4):615-9. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrs003. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

17.

Prostate and patient intrafraction motion: impact on treatment time-dependent planning margins for patients with endorectal balloon.

Steiner E, Georg D, Goldner G, Stock M.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 15;86(4):755-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.035. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

PMID:
23582854
18.

Strategy for online correction of rotational organ motion for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Rijkhorst EJ, van Herk M, Lebesque JV, Sonke JJ.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1608-17. Epub 2007 Oct 4.

PMID:
17919845
19.

Volumetric arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion with 6 and 18 MV: a planning comparison study.

Ost P, Speleers B, De Meerleer G, De Neve W, Fonteyne V, Villeirs G, De Gersem W.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 1;79(3):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.025. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

PMID:
20675077
20.

Anatomy- vs. fluence-based planning for prostate cancer treatments using VMAT.

Andreou M, Karaiskos P, Kordolaimi S, Koutsouveli E, Sandilos P, Dimitriou P, Dardoufas C, Georgiou E.

Phys Med. 2014 Mar;30(2):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.041. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23810258

Supplemental Content

Support Center