Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 219

1.

An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Kriza C, Emmert M, Wahlster P, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Review.

PMID:
23938237
2.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.

Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Rutter CM, Savarino JE, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM, Zauber AG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 18;102(16):1238-52. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq242. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

3.

CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Kim DH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1332-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2646.

PMID:
19380558
4.

Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.

Lucidarme O, Cadi M, Berger G, Taieb J, Poynard T, Grenier P, Beresniak A.

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

PMID:
21444171
5.

Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.

Pyenson B, Pickhardt PJ, Sawhney TG, Berrios M.

Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):2966-76. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0538-1.

6.

Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Iafrate F, Morini S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1509-16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1010.

PMID:
18941093
7.

Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Hanly P, Skally M, Fenlon H, Sharp L.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Oct;28(4):415-23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000542. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Review.

PMID:
23006522
8.

Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials).

Halligan S, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Wardle J, von Wagner C, Lilford R, Yao GL, Zhu S, Atkin W.

Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(54):1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta19540.

9.

At what costs will screening with CT colonography be competitive? A cost-effectiveness approach.

Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Habbema JD.

Int J Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;124(5):1161-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24025.

10.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.

Heresbach D, Chauvin P, Hess-Migliorretti A, Riou F, Grolier J, Josselin JM.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun;22(6):716-23. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832c76f6.

PMID:
19574924
11.

Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Laghi A, Kim DH, Zullo A, Iafrate F, Di Giulio L, Morini S.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 14;168(7):696-705. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.7.696. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1269. Pickhardt, Perry [corrected to Pickhardt, Perry J]; Kim, Daniel [corrected to Kim, Daniel H]. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1710.

PMID:
18413551
12.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Morini S.

Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2213-21.

13.

Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.

Lee D, Muston D, Sweet A, Cunningham C, Slater A, Lock K.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(3):141-54. doi: 10.2165/11535650-000000000-00000.

PMID:
20369905
14.

Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.

Regge D, Iussich G, Senore C, Correale L, Hassan C, Bert A, Montemezzi S, Segnan N.

Trials. 2014 Mar 28;15:97. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-97.

15.

CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Mavranezouli I, East JE, Taylor SA.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2485-97. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1058-y. Epub 2008 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
18584178
16.

The cost-effectiveness of CT colonography in screening for colorectal neoplasia.

Vijan S, Hwang I, Inadomi J, Wong RK, Choi JR, Napierkowski J, Koff JM, Pickhardt PJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):380-90. Epub 2006 Dec 11.

17.

Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.

Knudsen AB, Hur C, Gazelle GS, Schrag D, McFarland EG, Kuntz KM.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):611-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00005.

18.

A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.

van Gils P, van den Berg M, van Kranen H, de Wit AG.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jun;45(9):1554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Mar 2. Review.

PMID:
19261464
19.

Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.

Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Laghi A, Zullo A, Kim DH, Iafrate F, Morini S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jan;190(1):136-44.

PMID:
18094303
20.

CT Colonographic Screening of Patients With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Adults at Average Risk and Implications for Guidelines.

Pickhardt PJ, Mbah I, Pooler BD, Chen OT, Hinshaw JL, Weiss JM, Kim DH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Apr;208(4):794-800. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16724. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

PMID:
28125785

Supplemental Content

Support Center