Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 126

1.

Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Lee GW, Jang SJ, Shin SM, Jang JH, Kim JD.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24 Suppl 1:S145-51. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1287-x. Epub 2013 Aug 10.

PMID:
23934439
2.

Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Sasai K, Umeda M, Maruyama T, Wakabayashi E, Iida H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Dec;9(6):554-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI.2008.8.08122.

PMID:
19035747
3.

Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Jalil Y, Carvalho C, Becker R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):368-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000168.

PMID:
24365893
4.

Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.

Onyekwelu I, Glassman SD, Asher AL, Shaffrey CI, Mummaneni PV, Carreon LY.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):158-162. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16448. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

PMID:
27740396
5.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of microscopic partial pediculectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Yamada K, Matsuda H, Cho H, Habunaga H, Kono H, Nakamura H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):E723-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f4e12.

PMID:
23462578
6.

Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Postacchini R, Ferrari E, Cinotti G, Menchetti PP, Postacchini F.

Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.

PMID:
22005077
7.

Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.

Rajasekaran S, Thomas A, Kanna RM, Prasad Shetty A.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1737-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a056c1.

PMID:
23797498
8.
9.

Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.

Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Yamamoto R, Nakamae T, Izumi B, Ohta R, Fujioka Y, Ochi M.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S191-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1532-y. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

PMID:
25192849
10.

Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Gelalis ID, Arnaoutoglou C, Christoforou G, Lykissas MG, Batsilas I, Xenakis T.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):235-40. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2278.

11.

Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.

Nomura H, Yanagisawa Y, Arima J, Oga M.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):187-94. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE1373. Epub 2014 May 30.

PMID:
24878270
12.

Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.

Oertel MF, Ryang YM, Korinth MC, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V.

Neurosurgery. 2006 Dec;59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70.

PMID:
17277689
13.

Radiological improvements in global sagittal alignment after lumbar decompression without fusion.

Fujii K, Kawamura N, Ikegami M, Niitsuma G, Kunogi J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):703-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000708.

PMID:
25394314
14.

Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.

Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Pyo SY, Paulo D, Härtl R.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

PMID:
25635635
15.

One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up.

Kikuike K, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Shimizu K.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):593-601. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929cbd.

PMID:
19956034
16.

Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Gibson JN, Depreitere B, Pflugmacher R, Schnake KJ, Fielding LC, Alamin TF, Goffin J.

Spine J. 2015 Mar 2;15(3 Suppl):S23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

PMID:
25579423
17.

Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Rouben D, Casnellie M, Ferguson M.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.

PMID:
20975594
18.

Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Weber C, Giannadakis C, Rao V, Jakola AS, Nerland U, Nygaard ØP, Solberg TK, Gulati S, Solheim O.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):E78-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001166.

PMID:
26352747
19.

Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Choi WS, Oh CH, Ji GY, Shin SC, Lee JB, Park DH, Cho TH.

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):991-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3116-7. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

PMID:
24292345
20.

Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.

Kuchta J, Sobottke R, Eysel P, Simons P.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):823-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

Supplemental Content

Support Center