Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

How IRBs view and make decisions about social risks.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Jul;8(3):58-65. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.58.

2.

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8.

3.

How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.

Klitzman R.

J Med Ethics. 2014 Mar;40(3):193-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101174. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

4.

How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence.

Klitzman R.

J Med Ethics. 2013 Apr;39(4):224-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100439. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

5.

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.

Klitzman RL.

Dev World Bioeth. 2012 Aug;12(2):63-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00324.x. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

6.
7.

"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022796. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

8.

Views and experiences of IRBs concerning research integrity.

Klitzman R.

J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Fall;39(3):513-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00618.x.

9.

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US.

Klitzman R.

BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 23;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13.

10.

The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028773. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

11.

Local IRBs vs. federal agencies: shifting dynamics, systems, and relationships.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul;7(3):50-62. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.50.

12.

From anonymity to "open doors": IRB responses to tensions with researchers.

Klitzman R.

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 3;5:347. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-347.

13.

Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent?

Klitzman R.

Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):975-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182578b54.

14.

IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources.

Sirotin N, Wolf LE, Pollack LM, Catania JA, Dolcini MM, Lo B.

IRB. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):10-9. No abstract available.

15.

Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research.

Pullman D.

J Med Philos. 2002 Oct;27(5):523-45.

PMID:
12461709
16.

Sustaining engagement and partnership: model of enhancing cultural capital among nonaffiliated IRB members.

Hung Y, Ayala A, Morales F, Frierman-Hunt G, Moreno A, Nwachuku I.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Jul;8(3):34-45. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.34.

PMID:
23933774
17.

How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.

Pritchard IA.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):31-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.31. Review.

PMID:
21680975
18.

Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: where should we go from here?

De Vries R, DeBruin DA, Goodgame A.

Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):351-68.

PMID:
16625729
19.

The investigator and the IRB: a survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers.

Fischer BA, George P.

Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

20.

Clinical Research in Vulnerable Populations: Variability and Focus of Institutional Review Boards' Responses.

Kästner B, Behre S, Lutz N, Bürger F, Luntz S, Hinderhofer K, Bendszus M, Hoffmann GF, Ries M.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135997. eCollection 2015.

Supplemental Content

Support Center