Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 137

1.

Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.

Ollison WM, Crow W, Spicer CW.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Jul;63(7):855-63.

PMID:
23926854
2.

Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring.

Williams EJ, Fehsenfeld FC, Jobson BT, Kuster WC, Goldan PD, Stutz J, McClenny WA.

Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Sep 15;40(18):5755-62.

PMID:
17007137
3.

A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.

Spicer CW, Joseph DW, Ollison WM.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010 Nov;60(11):1353-64.

PMID:
21141429
4.

Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring.

Leston AR, Ollison WM, Spicer CW, Satola J.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Oct;55(10):1464-72.

PMID:
16295271
6.

Measurement of atmospheric ozone by cavity ring-down spectroscopy.

Washenfelder RA, Wagner NL, Dube WP, Brown SS.

Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 1;45(7):2938-44. doi: 10.1021/es103340u. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

PMID:
21366216
7.

Mechanism and elimination of a water vapor interference in the measurement of ozone by UV absorbance.

Wilson KL, Birks JW.

Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Oct 15;40(20):6361-7.

PMID:
17120566
8.

Ozone monitoring using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) and UV photometry instruments in Sohar, Oman.

Nawahda A.

Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Aug;187(8):485. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4706-0. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

PMID:
26138853
9.

Study of the uncertainty in NO2 chemiluminescence measurements due to the NO-O3 reaction in sampling lines.

Miñarro MD, Ferradás EG, Rico JB, Alonso FD, Martínez FJ, Trigueros CR.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2011 Mar;18(3):436-45. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0386-z. Epub 2010 Sep 4.

PMID:
20814830
10.

Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposures to O3, PM2.5, and CO.

Chang LT, Suh HH, Wolfson JM, Misra K, Allen GA, Catalano PJ, Koutrakis P.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Oct;51(10):1414-22.

PMID:
11686245
11.

High density ozone monitoring using gas sensitive semi-conductor sensors in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia.

Bart M, Williams DE, Ainslie B, McKendry I, Salmond J, Grange SK, Alavi-Shoshtari M, Steyn D, Henshaw GS.

Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Apr 1;48(7):3970-7. doi: 10.1021/es404610t. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

PMID:
24579930
12.
13.

Comparison of chemiluminescence and ultraviolet ozone monitor responses in the presence of humidity and photochemical pollutants.

Kleindienst TE, Hudgens EE, Smith DF, McElroy FF, Bufalini JJ.

Air Waste. 1993 Feb;43(2):213-22.

PMID:
15739516
14.

Changes in diurnal patterns related to changes in ozone levels.

Lefohn AS, Foley JK, Shadwick DS, Tilton BE.

Air Waste. 1993 Nov;43(11):1472-8.

PMID:
8260140
15.

An improved dual channel PERCA instrument for atmospheric measurements of peroxy radicals.

Green TJ, Reeves CE, Fleming ZL, Brough N, Rickard AR, Bandy BJ, Monks PS, Penkett SA.

J Environ Monit. 2006 May;8(5):530-6. Epub 2006 Apr 21.

PMID:
16688354
17.

Multiple regression analysis in modeling of columnar ozone in Peninsular Malaysia.

Tan KC, Lim HS, Mat Jafri MZ.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Jun;21(12):7567-77. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-2697-y. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

PMID:
24599658
18.

Assessment of a regulatory model's performance relative to large spatial heterogeneity in observed ozone in Houston, Texas.

Couzo E, Olatosi A, Jeffries HE, Vizuete W.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2012 Jun;62(6):696-706.

PMID:
22788108
19.

Adjoint sensitivity analysis of ozone nonattainment over the continental United States.

Hakami A, Seinfeld JH, Chai T, Tang Y, Carmichael GR, Sandu A.

Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Jun 15;40(12):3855-64.

PMID:
16830553
20.

Ozone exposure among Mexico City outdoor workers.

O'Neill MS, Ramirez-Aguilar M, Meneses-Gonzalez F, Hernández-Avila M, Geyh AS, Sienra-Monge JJ, Romieu I.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Mar;53(3):339-46.

PMID:
12661692

Supplemental Content

Support Center