Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 163

1.

Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women.

Peonim V, Worasuwannarak W, Sujirachato K, Teerakamchai S, Srisont S, Udnoon J, Chudoung U.

J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Aug;20(6):578-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

PMID:
23910836
2.

Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases.

Romero-Montoya L, Martínez-Rodríguez H, Pérez MA, Argüello-García R.

Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Mar 20;206(1-3):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 9.

PMID:
20692115
3.
4.

Evaluation of three rapid detection methods for the forensic identification of seminal fluid in rape cases.

Khaldi N, Miras A, Botti K, Benali L, Gromb S.

J Forensic Sci. 2004 Jul;49(4):749-53.

PMID:
15317189
5.

Diagnostic value of PSA and AP tests for the detection of spermatozoa in postmortem swabs from the genital and anal region in males.

Weitzig L, Schroeder AS, Augustin C, Raupach T, Sehner S, Anders S.

J Forensic Sci. 2015 Jan;60(1):41-4. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12632. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

PMID:
25387394
6.

Validation of the use of a commercially available kit for the identification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in semen stains.

Simich JP, Morris SL, Klick RL, Rittenhouse-Diakun K.

J Forensic Sci. 1999 Nov;44(6):1229-31.

PMID:
10582360
7.

[Identification of semen in bloodstains with the use of alternative light source and biochemical screening tests].

Gorzkiewicz M, Woźniak M, Grzybowski T, Łuczak S, Linkowska K, Daca P.

Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2008 Oct-Dec;58(4):182-7. Polish.

PMID:
19441689
8.

Positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reaction in post-mortem rectal swabs: a cautionary note.

Lunetta P, Sippel H.

J Forensic Leg Med. 2009 Oct;16(7):397-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 19.

PMID:
19733329
9.

Optimisation of choline testing using Florence Iodine reagent, including comparative sensitivity and specificity with PSA and AP tests.

Hardinge P, Allard J, Wain A, Watson S.

Sci Justice. 2013 Mar;53(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

PMID:
23380060
10.

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid.

Hochmeister MN, Budowle B, Rudin O, Gehrig C, Borer U, Thali M, Dirnhofer R.

J Forensic Sci. 1999 Sep;44(5):1057-60.

PMID:
10486959
11.

Good performance of rapid prostate-specific antigen test for detection of semen exposure in women: implications for qualitative research.

Hobbs MM, Steiner MJ, Rich KD, Gallo MF, Alam A, Rahman M, Menezes P, Chipato T, Warner L, Macaluso M.

Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Aug;36(8):501-6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2b4bf.

12.

Vaginal swab specimen processing methods influence performance of rapid semen detection tests: a cautionary tale.

Hobbs MM, Steiner MJ, Rich KD, Gallo MF, Warner L, Macaluso M.

Contraception. 2010 Sep;82(3):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.022. Epub 2010 Apr 13.

13.

Evaluation of semen detection in vaginal secretions: comparison of four methods.

Culhane JF, Nyirjesy P, McCollum K, Casabellata G, Di Santolo M, Cauci S.

Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008 Sep;60(3):274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00632.x. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

PMID:
18647289
14.

Prostatic acid phosphatase. Current assessment in vaginal fluid of alleged rape victims.

Schumann GB, Badawy S, Peglow A, Henry JB.

Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Dec;66(6):944-52.

PMID:
998567
15.

Bayesian evaluation of the modified zinc test and the acid phosphatase spot test for forensic semen investigation.

Hooft PJ, van de Voorde HP.

Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997 Mar;18(1):45-9.

PMID:
9095300
16.

Semen searching when sperm is absent.

Martínez P, Santiago B, Alcalá B, Atienza I.

Sci Justice. 2015 Mar;55(2):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

PMID:
25753997
17.

A comparison of methods used in the UK and Ireland for the extraction and detection of semen on swabs and cloth samples.

Allard JE, Baird A, Davidson G, Jones S, Lewis J, McKenna L, Weston C, Scrimger D, Teppett G.

Sci Justice. 2007 Dec;47(4):160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2007.09.010. Erratum in: Sci Justice. 2008 Jun;48(2):102.

PMID:
18229757
18.

Use of a Y chromosome probe as an aid in the forensic proof of sexual assault.

Dziegelewski M, Simich JP, Rittenhouse-Olson K.

J Forensic Sci. 2002 May;47(3):601-4.

PMID:
12051344
19.

Developmental validation of RSID™-Semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen.

Old J, Schweers BA, Boonlayangoor PW, Fischer B, Miller KW, Reich K.

J Forensic Sci. 2012 Mar;57(2):489-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01968.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

PMID:
22211796
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center