Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 112

1.

Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation.

Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Júnior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, Coelho PG.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e332-42. doi: 10.1111/cid.12129. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

PMID:
23910435
2.

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.

Borie E, Orsi IA, Noritomi PY, Kemmoku DT.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

PMID:
26478969
3.

Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.

de Souza Batista VE, Verri FR, Almeida DA, Santiago Junior JF, Lemos CA, Pellizzer EP.

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 May;20(6):663-670. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1287905. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

PMID:
28349769
4.

Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.

Bhering CL, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT, Noritomi PY, Consani RL, Barão VA.

Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Dec 1;69:715-25. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.059. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

PMID:
27612765
5.

Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Silva GC, Mendonça JA, Lopes LR, Landre J Jr.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):239-46.

PMID:
20369081
6.

Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.

Baggi L, Pastore S, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G.

J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jan;109(1):9-21. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60004-9.

PMID:
23328192
7.

Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.

Gümrükçü Z, Korkmaz YT, Korkmaz FM.

Comput Biol Med. 2017 Jul 1;86:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 4.

PMID:
28500959
8.

Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.

Kim KS, Kim YL, Bae JM, Cho HW.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):976-84.

PMID:
22010079
9.
10.

Finite element analysis of three zygomatic implant techniques for the severely atrophic edentulous maxilla.

Wen H, Guo W, Liang R, Xiang L, Long G, Wang T, Deng M, Tian W.

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):203-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

PMID:
24314571
11.

Mechanical behavior of dental implants in different positions in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla.

Corrêa CB, Margonar R, Noritomi PY, Vaz LG.

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Apr;111(4):301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

PMID:
24355510
12.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.

Fazi G, Tellini S, Vangi D, Branchi R.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):752-9.

PMID:
21841984
13.

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla.

Lee JS, Lim YJ.

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013;16(11):1143-9. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2012.654780. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

PMID:
22397684
14.

Stress distribution in delayed replanted teeth splinted with different orthodontic wires: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

de Souza FI, Poi WR, da Silva VF, Martini AP, Melo RA, Panzarini SR, Rocha EP.

Dent Traumatol. 2015 Jun;31(3):190-5. doi: 10.1111/edt.12159. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

PMID:
25604805
15.

Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Osman RB, Elkhadem AH, Ma S, Swain MV.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e198-208. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3019.

PMID:
24066336
16.

The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Cinar D, Imirzalioglu P.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):e1-e10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4048.

PMID:
27004295
17.
18.

Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.

Merıç G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Eser A, özden AU.

Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 Nov;69(6):374-84. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.572287. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

PMID:
21449688
19.

Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.

Zampelis A, Rangert B, Heijl L.

J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S35-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60006-7. Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Mar;99(3):167.

PMID:
17618932
20.

Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study.

Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01472.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center