Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 371

1.

Predictive value of zero calcium score and low-end percentiles for the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Vogler N, Meyer M, Fink C, Schoepf UJ, Schönberg SO, Henzler T.

Rofo. 2013 Aug;185(8):726-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335964. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

2.

Diagnostic role of coronary calcium scoring in the rapid access chest pain clinic: prospective evaluation of NICE guidance.

Yerramasu A, Lahiri A, Venuraju S, Dumo A, Lipkin D, Underwood SR, Rakhit RD, Patel DJ.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Aug;15(8):886-92. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu011. Epub 2014 Feb 9.

PMID:
24513880
4.

Incremental prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score versus CT angiography among symptomatic patients without known coronary artery disease.

Hulten E, Bittencourt MS, Ghoshhajra B, O'Leary D, Christman MP, Blaha MJ, Truong Q, Nelson K, Montana P, Steigner M, Rybicki F, Hainer J, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Di Carli MF, Nasir K, Abbara S, Blankstein R.

Atherosclerosis. 2014 Mar;233(1):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.029. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

5.

Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography in comparison with calcium scoring and clinical risk scores.

Hadamitzky M, Distler R, Meyer T, Hein F, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, Schömig A, Hausleiter J.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan;4(1):16-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.955351. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

6.

Diagnostic performance of algorithm for computer-assisted detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with acute chest pain: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Min JH, Kim SM, Lee S, Choi JH, Chang SA, Choe YH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):730-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11419.

PMID:
24660699
7.

Impact of coronary calcium score on the prevalence of coronary artery stenosis on dual source CT coronary angiography in caucasian patients with an intermediate risk.

Meyer M, Henzler T, Fink C, Vliegenthart R, Barraza JM Jr, Nance JW Jr, Apfaltrer P, Schoenberg SO, Wasser K.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

PMID:
22897947
8.

Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Choo KS, Hwangbo L, Kim JH, Park YH, Kim JS, Kim J, Chun KJ, Jeong DW, Lim SJ.

Acta Radiol. 2013 May;54(4):389-95. doi: 10.1177/0284185113475440. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23550182
9.

Influence of calcifications on diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography using prospective ECG triggering.

Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, Baumüller S, Marincek B, Alkadhi H.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1684-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.4040.

PMID:
19020236
10.

Assessment of Agatston coronary artery calcium score using contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography.

van der Bijl N, Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Kroft LJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):1299-305. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3734.

PMID:
21098187
11.

Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography.

Yoo DH, Chun EJ, Choi SI, Kim JA, Jin KN, Yeon TJ, Choi DJ.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;27 Suppl 1:27-35. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9968-1. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

PMID:
22113322
12.

Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined.

Lau GT, Ridley LJ, Schieb MC, Brieger DB, Freedman SB, Wong LA, Lo SK, Kritharides L.

Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):415-22.

PMID:
15858083
13.

Does coronary CT angiography improve risk stratification over coronary calcium scoring in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease? Results from the prospective multicenter international CONFIRM registry.

Al-Mallah MH, Qureshi W, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Cademartiri F, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Cheng VY, Delago A, Gomez M, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann PA, Leipsic J, Maffei E, Raff G, Shaw LJ, Villines TC, Cury RC, Feuchtner G, Plank F, Kim YJ, Dunning AM, Min JK.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;15(3):267-74. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet148. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

PMID:
23966421
14.

Image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp in a clinical setting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Zhang LJ, Wang Y, Schoepf UJ, Meinel FG, Bayer RR 2nd, Qi L, Cao J, Zhou CS, Zhao YE, Li X, Gong JB, Jin Z, Lu GM.

Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):797-806. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3868-z. Epub 2015 Sep 17.

PMID:
26382844
15.
16.

Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate.

Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, Deviggiano A, Goldsmit A, Tajer C, Bettinotti M, Carrascosa J, Ivanc TB, Fallahi A, García MJ.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 May-Jun;4(3):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 11.

PMID:
20444666
17.

Usefulness of additional coronary calcium scoring in low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering impact on total effective radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.

Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burger IA, Buechel RR, Pazhenkottil AP, von Schulthess P, Wyss CA, Gaemperli O, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Feb;17(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

PMID:
19944630
18.

Combining cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography coronary calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of morphological coronary disease?

Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Plass A, Leschka S, Falk V, Kozerke S, Wyss C, Donati OF.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Oct;27(7):969-77. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9738-5. Epub 2010 Oct 31.

PMID:
21052842
19.

Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry.

Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Cheng VY, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Delago A, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann P, Lin FY, Maffei E, Raff GL, Min JK; CONFIRM Registry Investigators.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):2533-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.851. Epub 2011 Nov 9.

20.

Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.

Layritz C, Schmid J, Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Wuest W, May M, Ropers D, Klinghammer L, Daniel WG, Pflederer T, Lell M.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1238-45. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu113. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

PMID:
24939952

Supplemental Content

Support Center