Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 138

1.

Site-dependent effects of tDCS uncover dissociations in the communication network underlying the processing of visual search.

Ball K, Lane AR, Smith DT, Ellison A.

Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):959-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

PMID:
23849715
2.

Functional interaction between right parietal and bilateral frontal cortices during visual search tasks revealed using functional magnetic imaging and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Ellison A, Ball KL, Moseley P, Dowsett J, Smith DT, Weis S, Lane AR.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 4;9(4):e93767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093767. eCollection 2014.

3.

The Behavioral Effects of tDCS on Visual Search Performance Are Not Influenced by the Location of the Reference Electrode.

Ellison A, Ball KL, Lane AR.

Front Neurosci. 2017 Sep 21;11:520. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00520. eCollection 2017.

4.

Cathodal transcranial direct-current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex enhances human temporal discrimination ability.

Oyama F, Ishibashi K, Iwanaga K.

J Physiol Anthropol. 2017 Dec 4;36(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40101-017-0157-3.

5.

The involvement of posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields in spatially primed visual search.

Lane AR, Smith DT, Schenk T, Ellison A.

Brain Stimul. 2012 Jan;5(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

PMID:
22037138
6.

The involvement of posterior parietal cortex in feature and conjunction visuomotor search.

Lane AR, Smith DT, Schenk T, Ellison A.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):1964-72. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21576. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

PMID:
20849232
7.

Dissociating the neural mechanisms of distance and spatial reference frames.

Lane AR, Ball K, Ellison A.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.019. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

PMID:
25541500
8.

Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.

Lane AR, Ball K, Smith DT, Schenk T, Ellison A.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Feb;34(2):356-66. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21433. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

PMID:
22042759
9.

Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS.

Moos K, Vossel S, Weidner R, Sparing R, Fink GR.

J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 14;32(46):16360-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6233-11.2012.

10.

The effect of oppositional parietal transcranial direct current stimulation on lateralized brain functions.

Li LM, Leech R, Scott G, Malhotra P, Seemungal B, Sharp DJ.

Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Dec;42(11):2904-14. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13086. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

11.

Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills.

Bolognini N, Fregni F, Casati C, Olgiati E, Vallar G.

Brain Res. 2010 Aug 19;1349:76-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.053. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

PMID:
20599813
12.

Far-space neglect in conjunction but not feature search following transcranial magnetic stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex.

Mahayana IT, Liu CL, Chang CF, Hung DL, Tzeng OJ, Juan CH, Muggleton NG.

J Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;111(4):705-14. doi: 10.1152/jn.00492.2013. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

PMID:
24259544
13.

Dissociable effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS reveal distinct functional roles for right parietal cortex in the detection of single and competing stimuli.

Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.038. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

PMID:
25637773
14.

Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates allocentric target detection.

Medina J, Beauvais J, Datta A, Bikson M, Coslett HB, Hamilton RH.

Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

15.

The effects of tDCS upon sustained visual attention are dependent on cognitive load.

Roe JM, Nesheim M, Mathiesen NC, Moberget T, Alnæs D, Sneve MH.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

16.

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on posterior parietal cortex disrupts visuo-spatial processing in the contralateral visual field.

Schweid L, Rushmore RJ, Valero-Cabré A.

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(3):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1245-0. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

PMID:
18196224
17.

rTMS-induced virtual lesion of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) alters the control of reflexive shifts of social attention triggered by pointing hands.

Porciello G, Crostella F, Liuzza MT, Valentini E, Aglioti SM.

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:148-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 May 9.

PMID:
24813151
18.

When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities.

Weiss M, Lavidor M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Sep;24(9):1826-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00248. Epub 2012 May 25.

PMID:
22624605
19.

Induction of visual dream reports after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCs) during Stage 2 sleep.

Jakobson AJ, Fitzgerald PB, Conduit R.

J Sleep Res. 2012 Aug;21(4):369-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00994.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

20.

Transcranial direct current stimulation of the frontal-parietal-temporal area attenuates smoking behavior.

Meng Z, Liu C, Yu C, Ma Y.

J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jul;54:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

PMID:
24731752

Supplemental Content

Support Center