Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: it takes two to tango.

Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Knaapen P.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Oct;20(5):874-90. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9753-8. Review.

PMID:
23842709
2.

Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.

Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, Post MC, Van der Heyden JA, de Kroon TL, van Es HW, Rensing BJ, Verzijlbergen JF.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul;14(7):642-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes303. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

PMID:
23291392
3.

SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD.

Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Hachamovitch R, Abidov A, Germano G, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, Kang X, Slomka P, Rozanski A.

Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Apr;54(2):177-200. Review.

PMID:
20592682
4.

Hybrid CT angiography and quantitative 15O-water PET for assessment of coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.

Thomassen A, Petersen H, Diederichsen AC, Mickley H, Jensen LO, Johansen A, Gerke O, Braad PE, Thayssen P, Høilund-Carlsen MM, Vach W, Knuuti J, Høilund-Carlsen PF.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Dec;40(12):1894-904. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2519-3. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

PMID:
23982453
5.

Cardiac hybrid imaging.

Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA, Alkadhi H.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41 Suppl 1:S91-103. Review.

PMID:
24658682
6.

Quantitative PET/CT measures of myocardial flow reserve and atherosclerosis for cardiac risk assessment and predicting adverse patient outcomes.

Valenta I, Dilsizian V, Quercioli A, Ruddy TD, Schindler TH.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Mar;15(3):344. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0344-0. Review.

PMID:
23397541
7.

Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.

Winther S, Svensson M, Jørgensen HS, Bouchelouche K, Gormsen LC, Pedersen BB, Holm NR, Bøtker HE, Ivarsen P, Bøttcher M.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 May;8(5):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

8.

Automatic alignment of myocardial perfusion PET and 64-slice coronary CT angiography on hybrid PET/CT.

Nakazato R, Dey D, Alexánderson E, Meave A, Jiménez M, Romero E, Jácome R, Peña M, Berman DS, Slomka PJ.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):482-91. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9528-7. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

9.

Cardiac PET-CT for monitoring medical and interventional therapy in patients with CAD: PET alone versus hybrid PET-CT?

Truong QA, Gewirtz H.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Mar;16(3):460. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0460-5. Review.

10.

Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease.

Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, Harms HJ, de Haan S, van den Oever ML, Heymans MW, Tulevski II, van Kuijk C, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA, Lubberink M, van Rossum AC, Knaapen P.

J Nucl Med. 2013 Jan;54(1):55-63. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.104687. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

11.

Cardiac PET/Computed Tomography Applications and Cardiovascular Outcome.

Schindler TH.

PET Clin. 2015 Jul;10(3):441-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Review.

PMID:
26099678
12.

Cardiac PET-CT.

Di Carli MF, Dorbala S.

J Thorac Imaging. 2007 Feb;22(1):101-6. Review.

PMID:
17325581
13.

[Hybrid cardiac SPECT-CT for coronary heart disease].

Jager PL, Mouden M, Knollema S, Timmer JR, Oostdijk AH, Ottervanger JP.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(41):A3796. Dutch.

PMID:
22008161
14.

[Cardiac hybrid imaging].

Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA.

Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011 May;6:32-42. Review. German.

PMID:
22528176
15.

The role of noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease detection, prognosis, and clinical decision making.

Dowsley T, Al-Mallah M, Ananthasubramaniam K, Dwivedi G, McArdle B, Chow BJ.

Can J Cardiol. 2013 Mar;29(3):285-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.10.022. Epub 2013 Jan 26. Review.

PMID:
23357601
16.

Combined Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Artery Calcium Score by Hybrid 82Rb PET/CT Improves Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.

Brodov Y, Gransar H, Dey D, Shalev A, Germano G, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Rogatko A, Berman DS, Slomka PJ.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Sep;56(9):1345-50. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.153429. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

17.

Advances in rubidium PET and integrated imaging with CT angiography.

Smith MF.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Mar;10(2):135-41. Review.

PMID:
18417014
18.

Anatomy and function: PET-CT.

Kajander S, Saraste A, Ukkonen H, Knuuti J.

EuroIntervention. 2010 May;6 Suppl G:G87-93. doi: 10.4244/. Review.

PMID:
20542835
19.

Noninvasive anatomical coronary artery imaging versus myocardial perfusion imaging: which confers superior diagnostic and prognostic information?

Hacioglu Y, Gupta M, Budoff MJ.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Sep-Oct;34(5):637-44. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e10525. Review.

PMID:
20861763
20.

Cardiac PET, CT, and MR: what are the advantages of hybrid imaging?

Saraste A, Knuuti J.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):24-31. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0231-0.

PMID:
22090194

Supplemental Content

Support Center