Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 157

1.

Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.

Katkar RA, Kummet C, Dawson D, Moreno Uribe L, Allareddy V, Finkelstein M, Ruprecht A.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(9):20130059. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130059. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

2.
3.

Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.

Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Jul;38(5):262-73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/81889955.

PMID:
19474253
4.

A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.

Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V.

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e678-88.

6.

Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography.

de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

7.

Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.

Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG.

Angle Orthod. 2008 May;78(3):387-95. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1.

PMID:
18416632
8.

Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.018.

9.

A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.

Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Nov;10(11):1737-52. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1173-6. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

PMID:
25847662
10.

Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.

Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):550-60.

PMID:
17920510
11.

Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.

Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Balachandran R, Sardana V, Kalra S, Chaurasia S, Sardana HK.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):118-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.027.

PMID:
28024764
12.

A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.

van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

PMID:
20044238
13.

Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.

Burkhard JP, Dietrich AD, Jacobsen C, Roos M, Lübbers HT, Obwegeser JA.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

PMID:
24864074
14.

Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.

Neiva MB, Soares ÁC, Lisboa Cde O, Vilella Ode V, Motta AT.

Angle Orthod. 2015 Jan;85(1):11-7. doi: 10.2319/120413-891.1.

PMID:
24713068
15.

Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.

Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

PMID:
20640463
16.

Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.

Frongia G, Piancino MG, Bracco AA, Crincoli V, Debernardi CL, Bracco P.

Cranio. 2012 Oct;30(4):255-63.

PMID:
23156966
17.

Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.

Naji P, Alsufyani NA, Lagravère MO.

Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;84(5):762-72. doi: 10.2319/090413-652.1. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

PMID:
24364751
18.
19.

Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.

Zhao ZM, Zhu Y, Huo R, Su JR, Gao F.

J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Nov;25(6):1939-42. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001039.

PMID:
25329850
20.

Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.

van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.04.025.

PMID:
19070753

Supplemental Content

Support Center